Here
is the list of all web pages which should
be available at this address (i.e. from this
server), arranged by language (in 8 languages).
It represents a more frequently updated version
of "Menu 1". Choose below the page that interests
you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
web page to run it:
(The same list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 2.)
Here is the list of addresses of all
totaliztic web sites that still worked
at the date of the most recent update
of this web page. At each of these addresses
should be available all totaliztic web pages
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2",
including also their different language versions
(i.e. versions in languages:
Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian,
Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select
the address which you wish to open by dragging
scroll bars in small window below, then click on
this address to run it. When opens the web
page which represents this address, then choose
from its "Manu 1" or
"Menu 2"
the web page which interests you and click on it
to view that page:
(The above list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 4.)
Welcome to this web page on already operational prototypes of extraordinary
"free energy generators". These devices generate technically useful
energy without consuming any fuel or any other form of energy.
So they can turn extremely important to our energy-starved
civilisation. The operation of these generators is exploiting a
phenomena of physics which are still unknown to our present
official science - for example a phenomenon which represents
a "reversal of friction" (i.e. similarly like "friction" spontaneously
converts motion into heat, this "reversal of friction" spontaneously
converts heat into motion).
In spite that such devices sounds extremely unusual, actually
several working prototypes was already build by devoted
hobbyists and was proven in operation. A primitive version
of one of these devices, i.e. the "telekinetic cell", was even
manufactured, after being embedded into components of
so-called "crystal radio" - which was the only appliance on Earth
that worked perfectly without any energy supply. Descriptions
of these working prototypes are to follow. Now is the right time
to investigate these devices scientifically in order to prepare
them to mass production. Our civilisation desperately needs them.
Part A:
Introductory information of this web page:
#A1.
What are goals of this web page:
There are numerous goals which I would
like to accomplish via publishing this web
page. The main goal is to indicate examples
of working prototypes of free energy generators
to these investigators who intend to build
or research such devices. In this way I hope
to encourage these investigators to continue
their efforts towards overcoming obstacles
placed on their paths by the
curse of inventors
(described in item #H1 on this web page),
and completing these urgently needed
generators of free energy on the Earth.
Another goal is to explain the design, operation,
specification, technical problems, and new potentials
which are linked to the generators of free energy
described here. In this way the page is to keep well
informed these investigators who decide to contribute
their own effort towards constructing perfectly working
prototypes of these revolutionary devices, and
in this way who attempt to lift the civilisation level
of humanity.
Additional goal of this web page is to disclose
and describe the
curse of inventors
which persecutes creators of new technologies
on the Earth (this curse is described in item
#H1 below). In turn through the describing and
explaining this secretive persecution of creators
of new technologies on the Earth, I hope to indirectly
help inventors and creative researchers, whom
the curse of inventors also disallow to accomplish
their own goals which could lift the civilisation level
of the humanity.
#A2.
The
philosophy of totalizm
reveals, that also in the matter of "perpetual motion" our scientists are mistaken:
The official human science is famous from
chronic committing cardinal errors and from
continuous need to deny of whatever it was
claiming earlier. There is several reasons
for such erroneousness of this science. The
most important one amongst these has the
philosophical nature and boils down to a
single-side view of the surrounding reality
by the official science. Namely, our
official science everything approaches from
the stand which by [philosophers is called
"a posteriori" - means "from effects
to a cause". in this one-sided approach
the science behaves like a tourist which looks
at a new city or country just from a comfortable
arm chair sitting on a balcony of the hotel in
which he temporally lives - as I am explaining
this more comprehensively e.g. in item #C1
of my web page named
telekinetics.htm
and in item #A2.6 of a different web page named
totalizm.htm.
(Not without a reason so-called "normal people"
insolently describe the present professional
scientists that they supposedly live on the
ivory towers -
which describing seems to also be supported
by analyses from item #I1 of the web page named
god_exists.htm
as well as from items #C2 to #C4 of the web page named
telekinetics.htm.)
In turn from the everyday life we know jolly well,
that if one really wants to get to know something,
then he must examine it thoroughly from at least
two different points of view, e.g. in case of getting
to know a new city or country, one needs to go far
from a luxory hotel and see how it looks like "from
behind" - while even better if one starts to live and
work in it for several successive years. in other
words, independently from that "a posteriori" approach
to research practiced by the old official science,
it is necessary to research the surrounding
reality also from a completely opposite approach,
by the philosophers called "a priori" - means
"from causes to effects". This opposite approach
is already practiced by the new and "competitive"
towards the old official one, still unofficial science
called the "totaliztic science"
(descriptions of which the reader also may find in
items #C1 and #A2.6 from the abovementioned my
web pages). Another reason for which the official
science continually is at error and commits "cardinal
mistakes" is that, as so far, it maintains an "absolute
monopole for knowledge", and thus NO-ONE verifies
statements of this science - because so-far it has no
official "competition". (But currently such a "competition"
gradually emerges in the form of this new unofficial
"totaliztic science" that I already mentioned above.)
As this is revealed to us by the
philosophy of totalizm,
one amongst such matters about which the
official human science for sure is mistaken,
is the possibility to build the so-called "perpetual
motion". So-far the official human science
categorically announces that supposedly a
"perpetual motion cannot be build" because
the principle of operation of it would run against
so-called "laws of thermodynamics". However, the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
(from which the philosophy of totalizm originates),
proves to us logically that devices called "perpetual
motion" are just versions of present "windmills"
in which for "winds" which propel these devices
are used phenomena which "blows" continually
for thousands (or even millions) of years with
always the same force.
In other words, a "perpetual motion" can be build
immediately after the humanity fulfils two following
conditions, namely (1) someone discovers a kind
of "wind" which would "blow" continually and with
the same force e.g. for millions of years, and (2)
an inventor finds a principle of converting "blows"
of such a "wind" into some noticeable manifestation -
e.g. into a motion or propelling energy. As it turns
out, the condition (1) is already fulfilled a long ago.
After all, the present science knows a number
of natural phenomena which represent kinds of
"winds" that "blow" continually for millions of
years. Examples of such "winds" include:
the rotation of our planet Earth, the motion of
Moon around the Earth, the magnetic field
of the Earth, waves of a "cosmic noise",
temperature difference between surface
of the Earth and e.g. the absolute zero
of cosmic space or coolness of upper
atmosphere, various behaviours of elementary
particles, the reversal of friction (i.e. "telekinesis"),
and many more. Thus, the only step that is left
in order to really introduce "perpetual motion" to
everyday life, is to work out a principle of operation
with the use of which from one amongst these
continual "winds" can be retried a form of motion
or useful energy. Because human inventive
capabilities do NOT know limits, the working
out and implementation of such a principle
is just only a mater of time.
Several principles of operation which convert such
"infinitively blowing winds" into a motion or useful
form of energy are already described on totaliztic
web pages. Examples of these are all principles
used in devices from this web page, and also
principles described on web pages named
fe_cell.htm,
boiler.htm,
telekinetics.htm,
eco_cars.htm,
and in item #G2 from the web page
pajak_jan_uk.htm.
Thus, in spite that with the active effort of immoral
people the so-called "curse of inventors" (described
in item #H1 of this web page) still obstructs the
industrial implementation of these principles of
operation, unavoidably approaches the time when
some form of the "perpetual motion" becomes
constructed by someone and implemented in
the real life, while the official human science
will again be forced to jump under a table and
publicly retract ("bark out") whatever it previously
claimed on this subject.
An illustrative explanation how a "windmill" propelled
by invisible and still unknown to our science "wind"
would be taken for the "perpetual motion" and thus
persecuted by present scientists, is also presented
in item #A2 of the separate web page
oscillatory_chamber.htm.
#A3.
What motivated me to prepare this web page:
Motto:
The philosophy of
totalizm
teaches, that our physical world was intentionally created in such a manner, that
'everything that humans can think of, humans can also accomplish' - only that someone must firstly find a manner how to implement a given idea."
(See subsection #I5.4.2 from volume 5 of
monograph [1/5].)
The reader probably saw in a television an
advertisement of so-called "heat pumps".
In order to be understandable to an ordinary
bread eater, and simultaneously to appeal
to the wallet of the viewer, these advertisements
usually state that e.g. if you spend 1 dollar
for electricity which propels such a "heat pump",
then this heat pump fills up your flat with the
heat worth (let say) 3 dollars. If someone
translate this advertisement onto a technical
language, then it actually states that the energy
efficiency of these heat pumps exceeds 100%.
This means that such heat pumps generate
much more thermal energy than the amount
of electrical energy they consume. Of course,
since it is possible to build technical devices
which for any reasons generate much more
energy than the amount of energy consumed
to sustain their operation, then immediately
an idea comes to the mind, to redirect into
a feedback loop a part of the excess of
energy that they generate, and supply their
own operation with this looped energy. The
outcome of such looping of energy would
be that we would obtain a "generator of free
energy". After all, such a generator would
supply itself into the energy that it requires
for sustaining its own operation. Simultaneously
an excess of the energy that it generates
would be released for a consumption.
This excess would be gained completely
"for free" (hence the name "free energy").
Thus the idea of "generators of free energy"
is very simple. Also, as we see it from the over
100% efficiency of "heat pumps", this idea is
actually technically feasible. Only that in order
it is implemented practically, we firstly need to
overcome several barriers. The most important
amongst these "barriers to overcome" is
a psychological barrier. As almost everyone
knows, the official human science implanted
a view to every person on the Earth, that devices
in past called "perpetual motion" never can be
build - because their principle of operation
supposedly runs against laws of the physical
world. In turn the name "perpetual motion" is
simply an old Latin name for the most vital
component of present "generators of free energy".
This prejudice towards generators of free energy,
officially imprinted in minds of all people, is extremely
destructive. It discourages psychologically the
majority of potential researchers to even consider
building such devices. Thus these researchers
never are going to think how to overcome next
barriers which holds back the building of these
devices, such as the barrier of lack of knowledge
of their principles of operation, or the barrier of
actual technical implementation of these devices.
Fortunately for the humanity, there were some
courageous hobbyists, who realised that since
the official human science chronically is at wrong
with practically all possible matters, probably it
is also at wrong in the matter of impossibility of
building perpetual motion devices. Thus, these more
courageous amongst them undertook the building
of such devices or undertook their theoretical
research. Thanks to these few courageous people,
we already have on the Earth first working prototypes
of these devices - in spite that the official human
science still claims that supposedly these devices
cannot be build. However, contrary to the actual
existence of these working prototypes, the official
science still stubbornly denies the possibility that
they can be build. This creates quite a paradox
situation on the Earth. On one hand such devices
already do exist, but on the other hand it is officially
claimed that these devices do NOT exist. The
situation resembles me the situation with many
other important matters that are officially denied
by the human science, such as UFOs, ghosts,
souls, God, another world, etc., etc. Of course,
this official claiming that free energy generators
do NOT exist and cannot be build is highly
destructive. After all, it blocks the technical
progress of humanity. So in order to assist
in the breaking through the impasse caused
by such a situation, I decided to publish this
web page. My motivation for the publishing it
provided the actual existence of first working
prototypes of free energy generators.
According to my understanding, the reason for
which the official human science still stubbornly
denies the existence and possibility of building
these devices, is taking by the science the lack
of serial production of these devices in factories,
for the impossibility of building them. However,
true reasons for which these devices are NOT
produced in factories so-far, do NOT mean that
these devices cannot be build at all. Frequently
these true reasons include, amongst others,
either (1) bureaucratic
obstacles (as this is the case with the "telekinetic
heater" described in part #E of this web page),
or (2) their too small, as so-far, energy effectiveness
which does NOT justifies their practical utilisation
(as this is the case with the "perpetually rotating
flywheel" described in part #F of this web page),
or (3) practical incompatibility of their energy
output to present energy requirements (as this
is the case with the "telekinetic influenzmaschine"
described in part #D of this web page). In other
words, for naive people the official science still
gets away with the lies that these devices CANNOT
be build, only because as so-far these devices
for various reasons cannot be seen in every shop
or in every house. However, although just in places
which for general public are difficult to access,
first working prototypes of these devices already
do exist. I hope, that through publishing this web
page, and through indicating here where or how
prototypes of these extraordinary devices can
be seen with one's own eyes, I could assist for a growing
number of people to understand that first working
prototypes of these generators in fact do exist and
in fact already work. Only that these prototypes still
require further research, development, and improvements,
before we are able to manufacture them in factories
and purchase them in shops.
Part #B:
Theoretical foundations of the generators of free energy:
#B1.
What is this "free energy":
The name "free energy" already established
itself on our planet for an entire class of working
devices. These devices can be defined in the
following manner: "free energy devices are
generators of energy or mechanical motion which
are supplied into energy by some phenomenon
which still remains unknown to the humanity (e.g.
by some invisible "wind" described in item #A2
above), and thus which make impressions that
their energy efficiency exceeds 100% ".
An example of such devices can be generators
of energy the operation of which is based on the
physical phenomenon that represents a reversal
of friction. Sometimes the name "free energy"
is also used for describing general principles on
which these devices generate energy (means they
generate energy literally "for free"). Due to the
employment of e.g. the reversal of friction, devices
that generate free energy actually cause the
spontaneous conversion of thermal energy
contained in the environment into motion of
selected objects (e.g. into motion of electrons
in a wire). The main goal adopted by developers
of these devices, is to work out such an operation
of free energy generators, that they generate
energy without actual consuming any fuel, or
any other form of external energy supplied to
them by users. So these devices generate
energy literally at zero cost - means for free.
The misunderstanding of operation of these
devices by current orthodox science, induced
a kind of condemnation atmosphere that prevails
amongst present scientists. This atmosphere
claims that free energy devices supposedly
are not going to work, and that their operation
supposedly breaks the Energy Conservation Principle plus few other
laws of thermodynamics. However, as it turns out, these devices are already
working - an example of one that works perfectly is shown on the first
photograph "Fig. #B1" from this web page (i.e. on Figure LA4 from
monograph [1/5]).
Also, they do not break any law of thermodynamics at all, because their
operation utilises the phenomenon which represents a reversal of friction.
#B1.2.
Definitions of terminology: "generators of free energy", "perpetual motion", "renewable energy devices":
Let us define now what in fact we understand
on this web page by this extraordinary energy
devices which generate energy without consuming
any fuel nor requiring technical supply into energy.
Let us start from defining devices called here
generators of free energy.
Generators of free
energy are technical devices which as a whole
generate practically useful excess of energy
of a useable form, without consuming for this
any fuel nor requiring any external supply in
energy. As such, generators of
free energy are characterised by several unique
attributes, for example:
(1) they are supplied into energy by some phenomenon
which still remains unknown to the humanity (e.g.
by some invisible "wind" described in item #A2
above), thus they make an impression that their
energy efficiency exceeds 100% - means that
they generate much more energy than the energy
required to propel them (see also item #B1 on the
totaliztic web page named
boiler.htm),
(2) they have build-in the "energy feedback loop"
which redirects a part of the energy that they generate
for self-supplying their own propulsion - thus they
do not require any external energy or fuel supply,
(3) their energy yield is sufficient for justifying their
utilisation as generators of energy, (4) the form
of energy they generate allows for a practical
utilisation of this energy, etc., etc.
Because of these unique attributes, the construction
of generators of free energy is indescribably
important for the future of our civilisation. After
all, this construction is going to solve all present
energy problems of humanity. In spite of this,
inventors who work on the development of these
extraordinary devices, are viciously persecuted -
amongst others with the aid of this "curse of inventors"
described in "part #H" of this web page. A curious
thing is that the biggest enemies of the builders
of these extraordinary generators are present
scientists - means people who are paid by the
society to promote progress. Also the fact that
the official science was forced already hundreds
of times by the real life to overturn its own previous
claims, and also the fact that the first such generators
of free energy are already operational on the Earth,
does NOT seem to hold back many present scientists
from the escalation of destruction through erroneous
telling the society that such devices cannot be build.
At this point it is worth to add, that there is only
a small difference between "generators of free
energy" and devices which in past were called
with the Latin name perpetual motion.
Namely, generators of free energy generate
practically useful amounts of some form of energy.
As such, they are technically useful for the society.
Examples of "free energy generators" described
on this web page include the "telekinetic cells",
"telekinetic influenzmaschines", and "telekinetic
heaters". In turn "perpetual motion" devices
generate enough energy to enable them
to continue forever some form of visually
noticeable motion. But the amount of energy
which these "perpetual motion" devices generate
in many cases can be too small to make them
useful in practice. Examples of such perpetual
motion devices include the "perpetually rotating
flywheel" described in "part #F" of this web page,
and also the so-called "PMM" (i.e. "permanent
magnet motor") described in subsection LA2.1
from volume 10 of
monograph [1/5].
From the technical point of view, the difference
between "free energy generators" and "perpetual
motion devices" boils down to (1) the use of a
phenomenon in their principles of operation,
which allows to form an "energy feedback loop"
(e.g. the use of technically induced telekinesis),
and (2) building-in this "energy feedback loop" into
given free energy generators so that a part of
energy excess which these generators provide
at the exit, is looped back to the entrance in order
to self-propel them. Devices which do NOT have
such an "energy feedback loop", such as the
"perpetual motion flywheel" described in part
#F of this web page, can only fulfil the function
of a "perpetual motion". In turn devices which
have such an "energy feedback loop" build into
them, such as the "telekinetic cell" described
in part #C of this web page, are able to work
as generators of free energy.
Generators of free energy described on this web
page, as well as perpetual motion devices, need
to be distinguished from devices for intercepting
and transformations of so-called "renewable energy".
The difference between them depends on the
continuity and reliability of the generation of energy.
Namely the generators of free energy and perpetual
motion devices are reliable and indestructible,
means they work always and forever. Also always
and forever they generate their energy or motion,
unless someone or something purposely switches
them off, or puts them out of order. Their example
can be the "perpetual motion flywheel" described
in part #F of this web page, which after is build,
will work reliably and continually practically forever,
or until someone or something destroys them.
On the other hand, devices for the intercepting
and transformations of "renewable energy" are
unreliable and work only when they receive
a supply of the required form of energy.
An example of these can be a windmill, which
generates energy only when a wind blows
with the required force. An interesting paradox
which hits our eyes, is that the official human
science recognises the existence and the
operation of devices capable to intercept such
renewable energy, but the same science denies
and contradicts the possibility that there is possible
to build reliable and infinitively working perpetual
motion devices and generators of free energy.
#B2.
Telekinesis - means the reversal of friction:
Motto:
"The philosophy of
totalizm
teaches that 'every phenomenon must have its counter-phenomenon'."
In 1924 the great French physicist, Louis
DeBroglie, published his important discovery,
which is sometimes called the "principle
of the symmetry of nature". According to
this principle, in our universe everything
is strikingly symmetrical in many ways.
DeBroglie's symmetry principle provided philosophical and scientific
foundations, which allow us to understand a number of natural phenomena,
thus opening them for explorations, discoveries, formulation of new
theories, completion of new devices, etc. For example: the Periodic
Table of the Elements (also called the Mendeléev Table), the existence
of a mirror duplicate for each elementary particle (e.g. electrons
and positrons, protons and antiprotons), and the similarities between
atoms and solar systems - all these document the symmetry existing in
the structure of matter. The similarities between equations that describe
different physical phenomena (e.g. Navier-Stock's equation describing
flow of fluids and Laplace's equation describing heat transfer) express
symmetry in the laws of nature. In turn the technological correspondence
between e.g. pumps and hydraulic motors, or electricity generators and
electric motors, reflect the symmetry in the operation of technical devices.
One of the vital implications of the DeBroglie's
symmetry, which has a direct bearing on the
creation of free energy generators, is the postulate
that "every phenomenon must have a
corresponding counter-phenomenon".
So far a large number of phenomena and
corresponding counter-phenomena has
already been discovered, which confirm
the correctness of this postulate. For example,
the existence of electrical luminescence utilized in fluorescent bulbs
and in various light-emitting diodes to transform electricity into light,
has a counter-phenomenon in the form of the photoelectric effect that
in photocells and solar panels transforms light into electricity. The
so-called "left-hand rule", also called the "motor effect", which
describes phenomena used for the transformation of electricity into
motion, has its counter-rule in the form of "Fleming's right-hand rule",
also called the "generator effect", which works in reverse,
i.e. it transforms motion into electricity. The Seebeck Effect,
which produces a flow of electrons through a junction of two dissimilar
conductors being heated, has its counter-phenomenon in the form
of the Peltier Effect, which causes the heating and cooling of materials
in a similar junction when a current is flowed through it.
The piezoelectric effect, which converts the deformation of
a crystal into electricity, and which is utilised e.g. in piezoelectric
lighters to produce an igniting spark, has its counter-partner in
a phenomenon which also is called "piezoelectric effect", although
it works in a reversed manner - i.e. it converts the electric impulse
into a deformation of a crystal (this counter-phenomenon is utilised
for example in piezoelectric vibration generators).
However, contemporary orthodox physicists claim
that there is an exception to this postulate. They
indicate friction to be this exception. According to
all to-date claims of orthodox scientists, friction is
considered to be the irreversible phenomenon,
which has no counter-phenomenon. But in 1985,
due to the formulation of a new scientific theory
which I named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
I was granted the privilege of discovering the
phenomenon which represents an exact reversal
of friction. Because in the natural form this
phenomenon is manifested during telekinetic
(or psychokinetic) motion, I named it the "Telekinetic Effect".
In the same way as friction spontaneously
converts motion into heat, the Telekinetic Effect spontaneously
converts heat into motion. Not long after the Telekinetic
Effect was discovered, I also managed to found technical ways of
releasing it (through an acceleration or deceleration of magnetic
field force lines).
The discovery, that the Telekinetic
Effect represents a reversal of friction, and a subsequent discovery
of the technological ways of activating this effect, provide the
theoretical foundation for building various free energy devices.
The reason for this is, that according to the mechanism of the
effect discussed here, all what is required in order to generate
such free electricity, is to subject a section of an electric wire
to the action of such an effect. In the result, all free electrons
that are contained in such a wire, are going to be put into the
telekinetic motion from one end of the wire to the other end. In turn such a
mass relocation of electrons in a wire, is nothing else but a flow
of electric current. The thermal energy that sustains this flow
originates from the environment, from which it is spontaneously extracted by the
mechanism of the reversal of friction. The Telekinetic Effect is
spontaneously extracting this energy from the environment just on
its own. So this energy does not need to be supplied to the device
which generates the free electricity (i.e. hence the expression "free energy").
#B3.
Evidence for the existence of the reversal of friction:
Since free energy devices utilise the reversal
of friction which so-far remained unknown to
orthodox scientists, the reader may wonder
whether we have any evidence that this
phenomenon does exist at all. As it turns
out, we have plenty of such evidence.
Actually entire subsection H1.2 from volume 4 of
monograph [1/5]
is devoted to description of this evidence.
The most widely known type of it are folklore observations that supernatural
kinetic phenomena always cause rapid temperature drops in rooms in which they
are observed. These temperature drops are in fact outcomes of the conversion of
thermal energy contained in the air from these rooms into some form of supernatural
motion. (Notice that the old expression "supernatural", in modern terminology
from this web site actually means "utilising principles of telekinesis".)
Other evidence stems from the observation of operational free energy devices that
already exist and work. All these devices always decrease the environmental temperature
while generating free energy. But the most objective proof for the existence
of the reversal of friction is the so-called "extraction glow" shown on the
last photograph from this web page. This glow is actually emitted because
atoms rapidly loose their thermal energy - for the detailed description of
this extraction glow see subsection H6.1.2 from volume 4 of
monograph [1/5].
#B4.
Perpetual motion = historic sightings of free energy devices:
Although the construction of operational
free energy devices is only possible after people mastered technical
release of the reversal of friction, someone kept showing such devices
to selected people since ancient times. These historic witnesses of such
devices used to call them "perpetum mobile", or "perpetual motion"
machines. Unfortunately, the operation of these devices cannot be
based on the phenomena of our physical world. (They utilise phenomena of
the counter-world.) Thus orthodox scientists coined an erroneous myth,
stating that supposedly it is impossible to build them at all. But the
life (and inventions described here) proved this myth to be wrong.
(Note that you can see the enlargement
of each photograph from this web site, simply by clicking on this photograph.
Most of the Internet browsers that you may use, including the popular "Internet Explorer",
allow also to download
each illustration to your own computer, and then look at it, reduce or enlarge
the size of it, or print it, with your own graphical software.)
* * *
Fig. #B1: "Thesta-Distatica", means a two-disk
"telekinetic influenzmaschine". It is the most
advanced free energy device which was build
on Earth so-far, and which actually works
producing abundance of free energy. A
relatively full description of this device is
presented in item #D1 of this web page.
Please notice that Methernitha has also
two smaller such devices working on the
same principle, which use a single disk
and which are called "Testatica".
(The above photograph originates from
monograph [1/5]
where it is shown on "Fig. LA4".)
* * *
The free energy device from "Fig. #B1" above (i.e. Figure LA4 from [1/5])
is called Thesta-Distatica.
It belongs to general category of so-called "telekinetic influenzmaschines".
The word "influenzmaschines" originates from the German language.
It designates a whole class of machines, which utilise the phenomenon
of electrostatic induction in their operation. This phenomenon is
called "influenz" in German. (One needs to distinguish between the
phenomenon of "influenz", and other phenomena that also can be
utilised in various electrostatic machines. For example the
Van de Graaff Generator utilises the phenomenon of "friction".)
Historic examples of influenzmaschines include the Töpler
machine with a single disk, or the Wimshurst electrostatic
machine with two disks. In turn "telekinetic influenzmaschines" are
more advanced versions of influenzmaschines, which for their operation
utilize additionally the phenomenon called the Telekinetic Effect.
(Means they utilize telekinesis in addition to effects of electrostatic influence.)
Principles of operation and design of telekinetic
influenzmaschines are described in details in
subsection LA2.3 from volume 10 of
monograph [1/5].
These principles are also briefly summarised
here, in the further part of this web page.
The telekinetic influenzmaschine "Thesta Distatica"
shown above was build by the Swiss Religious
Community calling itself the Methernitha.
The Thesta-Distatica generates around 3 kW AC 50 Hz electrical
energy at around 600 Volt. From the operational point of view,
it is actually an AC motor operating on principles of electrostatic
influence. This motor runs because free electrical energy
is supplied into it by a "telekinetic cell" that is embedded
into its design (the design and operation of such a telekinetic
cell is summarised in item #C1 of this web page, while
discussed in more details on a separate web page about
telekinetic cells).
The first two such telekinetic influenzmaschines called "Testatica" (with
single disks, based on principles of the Töpler machine) were
build not to produce free electricity, but to produce free
mechanical motion. The goal of their construction was to
illustrate visually to highly sceptical people and to orthodox
scientists, that because these machines can produce physical motion
without any form of energy supply, they actually prove that
the building of perpetual motion machines (also called
"perpetum mobile") is really possible.
Before I proceed with an explanation
how this Telekinetic Effect (means the "reversal of friction")
works and is utilised for the generation of free electricity,
I firstly need to introduce briefly a new scientific theory,
which explains principles of telekinesis and telekinetic motion.
(It also explains numerous other previously "mysterious" phenomena,
e.g. telepathy, the operation of time, energy, magnetic field,
and many more.) This new theory is called the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity. The Concept of Dipolar Gravity is an extremely
interesting scientific theory, which I would highly recommend
for reading. It turns out to be this special
Theory of Everything
searched by people for so long. For example, it explains
telekinesis and mechanism involved in telekinetic motion.
It explains the phenomenon of telepathy. (Telepathy is
discussed on a separate web site, namely on
telepathy.htm - about telepathy and telepathic communication devices.)
The Concept of Dipolar Gravity explains also what is this
"second world" called the "counter-world", to which we are shifting after our death.
It reveals where this second world is located. It explains
the nature of this counter-world. After all, it is this second
world where every telekinetic motion is initialised and carried out.
It discloses how our soul and spirit work and look like.
It allows to deduce what we feel at the moment of death
and during this shifting to another world. It explains
what is nirvana, how our feelings work, what is memory
and how memory works, and many more. (Actually all these
topics which stem from the Concept of Dipolar Gravity are
briefly addressed on appropriate web pages listed in the
"Menu 4",
which I recommend to visit.)
Descriptions of the "Concept of Dipolar Gravity"
are provided in all my vital monographs, starting
from volumes 4 and 5 of my newest
monograph [1/5]
entitled "Advanced Magnetic Devices", and
finishing with volumes 6 and 7 of my almost oldest
monograph [8]
entitled "Totalizm". Both these publications, means
monograph [1/5]
and
monograph [8],
as well as all other my monographs, are available
free of charge via this web page. Because it does
not take a lot of time to review these two volumes,
while they open our eyes on many phenomena
which previously remained unexplained, including
principles of operation of "free energy devices",
I am inviting you to have a look at them.
Those readers who have no time to read detailed
monograph [1/5],
may also find in Internet a summary of the description
of the "Concept of Dipolar Gravity". For example,
this concept is quite well presented on the web page
dipolar_gravity.htm.)
#B6.
Technical release of the "Telekinetic Effect":
The Concept of Dipolar Gravity explains
comprehensively the Telekinetic Effect.
One of vital details that it tells us, is the principle
utilised for triggering this effect technically. As
it turns out, in order to release the Telekinetic
Effect technically,
it is enough to accelerate or to decelerate magnetic
field force lines. All movable objects, that are wrapped
into such accelerated or decelerated force lines,
are experiencing action of the Telekinetic Effect.
Means that the phenomenon representing the "reversal
of friction" is actually starting to act upon them.
In turn this reversal of friction causes the spontaneous
absorption of thermal energy from the environment, and
conversion of this thermal energy into motion
of objects subjected to the Telekinetic Effect.
So if such accelerated magnetic field wraps for
example electrons inside of a wire of conductor, the result
is that these electrons start to rapidly move at the expense
of thermal energy from their environment. In turn such a
rapid motion of large quantities of electrons forms electric
current. Thus the technical release of the Telekinetic Effect
allows for a relatively easy generation of free electricity.
#B7.
Principles required to generate free energy:
Since the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity explained to us how to release the Telekinetic Effect
technically, this also tells us what general principle must
be used to generate free electricity. So, as it turns out,
every device for generation of free electricity must have
build into it some manner of accelerating or decelerating
force lines of magnetic field which are wrapping electrons
contained in conductive wires. In turn these accelerated
or decelerated force lines trigger the release of the Telekinetic
Effect that acts upon these electrons. The result is that the
Telekinetic Effect, acting as the reversal of friction,
spontaneously extracts thermal energy from the environment
that surrounds given wires, and transforms this thermal
energy into motion of electrons inside of the wire. This
motion in turn manifests itself as a flow of free electricity.
Such free electricity can be then used for supplying any electric
appliances, in a similar manner as electricity generated by
our current energy generators is. The only side effect of
such electricity generated by free energy devices is, that
it pulsates in a manner which tends to release a residual
Telekinetic Effect. Therefore near such free energy devices
various supernatural phenomena are going to take place,
which are not present around devices supplied with electricity
generated in a conventional manner.
In 1989 I had the honour of inventing a free
energy device, which I called then the
"telekinetic cell"
or the "telekinetic battery". This my theoretical
invention stemmed from the research on the
Telekinetic Effect that I completed earlier.
I described my invention quite well in
numerous publications, including my oldest
monograph [6] and newest
monographs [1/5]
available through this web site. Thus readers
are able to get a good understanding of the
operation of this device, simply by reading
my publications. As I later discovered with
an enormous shock, just such telekinetic
batteries that I invented earlier and described
in my publications, are already embedded
as main components in practically all
operational free energy devices in existence
on Earth. I could recognise them easily,
because I actually invented them. So I am
able to identify which parts of a given free
energy devices are components of the
telekinetic cell supplying a given device
with free electricity, in spite that these
components of the telekinetic cell are
embedded into the design of a given
device, and thus they normally are
undistinguishable from the device itself.
Telekinetic batteries of my invention are very
simple devices, which generate free electricity
without containing any moving parts. They can
operate both, as stand alone generators of free
electricity, or they may become components
of other devices, supplying them with free
electrical energy required for their operation.
For example, the energy required for running
the "Thesta-Distatica" shown above in the first
"Fig. #B1" (see LA4 from [1/5]) of this web page,
actually originates from a telekinetic cell. Also
the "telepathic pyramid" shown on "Fig. #C1"
to the right (see Figure K1 from [1/5]) is supplied
into electricity just by such a telekinetic cell.
Therefore, in order to understand the operation
of all free energy devices, we need to start from
learning the operation of telekinetic cells of my
invention.
Notice that there is also a separate web page
which is entirely devoted to the presentation of
the design and operation of the telekinetic cell
of my invention. This web page can be run from
"Menu 1" and "Menu 2" via the name
telekinetic cell.
#C2.
Components of a telekinetic cell:
A simple telekinetic cell is shown on
"Fig. #C1" (i.e. on the upper part of
Figure K1 from
monograph [1/5]) -
see it to the right from here. The interior
and components of this telekinetic cell are
illustrated in "Fig. #C2" (i.e. on the lower
part of that Figure K1 from [1/5]). In turn
their electrical connections are illustrated
on the electrical diagram from "Fig. #C4"
(i.e. Figure K3 from [1/5]). Here is the list
of main components of this cell:
1. Telekinetic inductors (I1) and (I2).
The most important component of every telekinetic
cell are two inductors marked (I1) and (I2) on all
my diagrams - including into this all diagrams
from this web page, as well as diagrams from
a separate web page on the
telekinetic cell
of my own invention. These inductors are
components in which the telekinetic generation
of free electricity is carried out. Both these
inductors are composed of permanent magnets,
onto which coils of conductors are wound up.
In order to provide the generation of free electricity
in both halves of sinusoidal cycles, two such inductors
are needed, on which coils are wound in two opposite
directions when related to the magnetic polarity
of their permanent magnets.
The principle of electricity
generation in these inductors is quite simple. Namely the magnetic
field of permanent magnets on which these inductors are wound,
changes the shape of (normally) sinusoidal curves of the electrical
impulses which flow through these inductors. The result is, that
instead of normally sinusoidal wave shape, this electricity starts
to follow a shape that accelerates and decelerates electrons.
In turn these accelerations and decelerations of electrons cause
the release of the Telekinetic Effect (means the "reversal of
friction") that acts on these electrons. The Telekinetic
Effect spontaneously converts heat contained in the environment
into a more powerful motion of electrons in wires. As the outcome,
such inductors add small portions of energy to each electrical
impulse that flows through them. Simultaneously they absorb heat
from their environment. (Means, while adding energy to the impulses
that flow through them, they simultaneously cool their environment
down.) So the Principle of Energy Conservation is fulfilled,
while the free electrical energy is generated.
2. Pulser (Q). The inductors
described above do not generate their own electricity. They only
telekinetically add the required power to weak electrical impulses
which already flows through them, but which originate from other sources.
Therefore, in order these inductors could work, they need to
be supplied with a constant stream of electric impulses. For
this reason, a second vital component of every telekinetic cell,
is the so-called pulser "Q". Such a pulser is simply any device
that supplies inductors I1 and I2 with an uniform stream of
electric impulses.
In the telekinetic inflenzmaschines shown above
in "Fig. #B1" (i.e. LA4 from [1/5]) and described
in item #D1 from the further part of this web page,
a pulser (Q) is simply a special electrode marked
"ho", which hangs just above a spinning disk and
in front of a permanent magnet, and thus which
gathers uniform electrical impulses from this spinning
disk. In turn in the "telekinetic cell" shown to the right
in "Fig. #C1" (i.e. in Figure K1 from [1/5]), this pulser
is simply a quartz crystal (Q) that is made to vibrate
uniformly by telepathic waves concentrated on it by
the resonance cavity of a pyramid.
3. Resonator (R).
Inductors of a telekinetic cell work by increasing
slightly the amount of electric power that is contained
in each single pulse of electricity which flows through
them. But these small amounts of power need later
to be added together in order to build up the energy
output from such a cell. This dynamic adding together
small increases of power is carried out by the component
called the "resonator" and marked (R) on "Fig. #C4"
(i.e. on Figure K3 from [1/5]). The resonator is simply
an oscillatory circuit. It works in a cell similarly like a
swing with a child, which to the energy already attached
to the body of this child adds each single portion of
energy that a parent contributes through repetitive
pushing this child in the process of swinging.
4. Reciprocator (T).
A next important component of every telekinetic
cell, is a "reciprocator" (marked "T" on all diagrams
from this web page and from monograph [1/5]).
(In old times reciprocators were called "coherers".)
If such a reciprocator is designed as a "tube"
then it contains a mixture of ordinary kitchen salt
with mercury, kept under vacuum.
The function of this "reciprocator" is quite a complex
one. The detailed description of this function is
provided in subsections K2.3 and LA2.3.3 from
monograph [1/5].
The most vital aspect of this function is also
explained on a separate web page about the
telekinetic cell,
where in order to describe it, an illustrative example
of starting a stationary steam locomotive is used.
But if we would like to summarise this function briefly,
it is a bit similar to the function of a phase shift in
position of both pistons from old steam locomotives,
or a phase shift in pistons of modern car engines.
(Unfortunately, no many people know that steam
locomotives, in order to be able to start moving
together with heavy wagons attached to them,
must have at least two pistons, which work with
appropriate mutual phase shifts of 90 degrees
in their cycles of strokes.) Namely, this
reciprocator prevents electrical deadlocks from
occurring between oscillations of subsequent components
of a given telekinetic cell. (As the reader probably knows,
every oscillatory system has two points in its motion, which
are called the "deadlock" points. For example, in engines these
two points are when pistons stop motion in one direction
and begin the motion in an opposite direction. When we have
a situation, like in a telekinetic cell, that several
separate oscillatory systems must cooperate with each other,
these deadlock points hinder the cooperation - if they are not
aligned with appropriate phase shift. In telekinetic cells
this phase shift is produced by the "reciprocator".) Actually,
without such a reciprocator, the telekinetic cell would not be able
to start nor to work properly. Because the operation of reciprocators
"T" is quite complex, I would advice to read about them
from subsections LA2.3.3 and K2.3 of
monograph [1/5],
where they are described quite comprehensively
and with all required details. A slightly more extensive
than here description of reciprocators is also provided
on the web page on
telekinetic cell
of my invention.
When one sees this reciprocator "T" in action on any free energy
device already build on Earth, it can be easily recognised because
it glows strongly. Namely the free energy which flows through it
causes that it emits a powerful light. The first photo on this
web page - see "Fig. #B1" above (or Figure LA4 from [1/5])
actually shows it glowing. In turn the "telekinetic battery"
from "Fig. #C2" (or Figure K1 (low) from [1/5]) shows it
in a non-glowing state (see the blue tube "T" visible by
the basis of the "telepathic pyramid").
#C2.1.
Notice that the same components of the "telepathic pyramid" simultaneously work as a telepathic transmitter and receiver (telepathyser):
The device called "telepathic pyramid" which
is described here in the function of a
telekinetic cell,
actually performs two different functions.
The cell is only the first one out of these two -
after all, in order this device could work it
must be somehow supplied with electricity.
The second function of the same "telepathic
pyramid" is the work as a telepathic transmitter
and receiver, means as a so-called telepathyser.
This second function, as well as the extraordinary
history of this pyramid, are described on a separate
web page
telepathy.htm.
Fig. #C1: The above photograph shows me (i.e.
Dr Jan Pajak)
holding in hands a device called the "telepathic
pyramid". A main component of such a telepathic
pyramid is a telekinetic cell which supplies
it with free electricity required for the operation.
(The above photograph originates from
monograph [1/5]
where it is shown in the upper part of Figure K1.)
The detailed design and operation of this device is explained
in subsection K2 from volume 9 of
monograph [1/5].
In turn the extraordinary history of this device, plus
also details of its operation, are explained in
treatise [7/2].
Both these publications, i.e.
monograph [1/5] and
treatise [7/2]
are downloadable free of charge from this web site.
Fig. #C2: The interior of the telepathic pyramid.
This photograph illustrates major components
of this device. Because each of these components
is simultaneously a component of the telekinetic
cell embedded into the telepathic pyramid in order
to supply it with electricity, this photograph illustrates
also main components of a telekinetic battery.
(The above photograph originates from
monograph [1/5]
where it is shown in the lower part of Figure K1.)
The list of components shown on this photograph,
as well as their operations, are explained in
subsection K2.2 from volume 9 of
monograph [1/5].
They are also briefly summarised in item #C2
of this web page. In addition, there is a separate web page
fe_cell.htm
on the telekinetic cell, which describes each of
these components in greater details.
Fig. #C3: The design of the "telepathic pyramid".
The above drawing illustrates also components
of a telekinetic cell that is embedded into this
telepathic transmitting and receiving device.
Names and labels of subsequent components
of this cell indicated on the above drawing
are described below under the illustration "Fig. #C4".
(The above illustration originates from
monograph [1/5]
where it is shown on Figure K2.) Apart from
subsection K2.2 from volume 9 of
monograph [1/5],
the components illustrated above are briefly
explained in item #C2 from this web page,
and also on a separate web page about the
telekinetic cell.
Fig. #C4: The electrical diagram and wiring of the
"telepathic pyramid". The subsequent components
of this device, which constitute a telekinetic cell and
which are described on this web page include: (I1)
and (I2) - telekinetic inductors, (Q) - a pulser, (R) -
a resonator which is just a simple oscillatory circuit
(note that two inductors (I1) and (I2) provide the
inductance required for the operation of this resonator,
while the vacuum capacitor formed by components
marked (D1), (D4), (F) and (C) is providing the
capacitance also required for work of this oscillatory
circuit), (T) - the reciprocator.
(The above illustration originates from
monograph [1/5]
where it is shown in Figure K3.)
The description of work of subsequent components
shown on this diagram, as well as explanation of the
work of the entire telekinetic cell contained in this
telepathic pyramid, are provided in subsection K2.4
from volume 9 of monograph
monograph [1/5].
These components are also summarised briefly in
item #C3 on this web page, and on a separate web
page about the
telekinetic cell.
#C3.
Designs of reciprocators which are already proven in operation:
Reciprocators are essential components
of telekinetic cells, without which these cells
refuse to work. They are also components,
the necessity and the key role of which is
not realised by most of present builders
of free energy devices. Fortunately for us,
as this is explained in details in item #4.4 of separate web page about
telekinetic cells,
there are numerous designs of reciprocators
already verified in operation. The most simple out
of such designs of reciprocators, is a cluster of
galena crystals probed with a "cat's whisker",
which was used in past as a reciprocator for
so-called "crystal radios". (These radios were
supplied into electrical energy by such telekinetic
cells embedded into their electronic circuits.)
More complex reciprocators contained a "tandem
of quartz crystals". These were used in two working
prototypes of telekinetic influenzmaschines
called "Testatica". But the most perfect one was
the reciprocator constructed as a "tube" with
a mixture of salt and mercury kept
under vacuum. It was used in prototypes of
"telepathic pyramids" shown here in "Fig. #C1".
I read also in one book that someone constructed
a working reciprocator (or more strictly a "coherer")
by parallel connection of several transistors.
Unfortunately, no details of this connection
were provided in there. Further data regarding
designs and operation of reciprocators are
provided on the separate web page about
telekinetic cells.
#C4.
Operation of a telekinetic cell:
The operation of telekinetic cells is extremely
simple, although it involves quite complex
phenomena that are described in details in
monograph [1/5].
This operation is illustrated on "Fig.#C4" above
(i.e. K3 from [1/5]). Every such a cell works
because a pulser "Q" sends to it an uniform
stream of electrical impulses. Each of these impulses is
reinforced with additional power by inductors I1 and I2.
Thus the power of each impulse is greater at the exit
from these inductors, than at the entry to them. So all that
is then needed, is to gather (means "add together") these
small increments of power carried by each impulse, and
forward them outside of the cell. This adding together is
carried out by the resonator "R" which also forwards the
energy so collected to the output terminal. Because the cooperation
between the resonator "R" and the pulser "Q" could be
hindered by the so-called "deadlocks" which occur in
all oscillatory systems, there is an additional component
called the reciprocator "T", which eliminates these deadlocks.
It removes the deadlock points, mutually synchronises the
oscillations in the resonator "R" with the oscillations
from the pulser "Q", and allows this device to initiate
its oscillations whenever the cell is switched on.
#C5.
How to build a telekinetic cell:
Should you have the appropriate housing
conditions and personal inclinations for
experimenting, finances for private research,
and inventive skills, I would highly recommend
to start building the telekinetic cell. However,
before you begin this building, I would also
recommend to read everything that describes
this device, so that you understand how it
operates and what phenomena occur inside
of it. You should at least read volumes 1, 4, 9
and 10 (i.e. chapters A, H, K, and LA) of
monograph [1/5].
Volume 4 explains to you the phenomenon of
telekinesis and the action of the Telekinetic
Effect, the understanding of which is absolutely
essential for the success in constructing this
device. Volumes 9 and 10 explain for you the
operation of free energy devices in general,
and telekinetic cells in particular. They also
explain for you, step by step, how to build
subsequent components of these devices
and what is vital in these components. In turn
volume 1, explains to you the realisty which
makes this device work. After you learn how
this cell works, you can gather the required
components, put them together, and initiate
your experiments. But hurry up, because this
device is urgently needed by our civilisation.
Perhaps it may even save humanity from the
extinction.
#C6.
Measurements of "efficiency" already have proven that primitive prototypes of
telekinetic cells -
which scientifically and in intentional manner were invented only by me in 1989,
in an unaware and accidental manner were built-in to circuitry of so-called "crystal radios":
As I explained this more exactly in items #H1
to #H3 of the separate web page named
fe_cell.htm,
almost a century ago primitive prototypes
of my "telekinetic cells" were already manufactured
on the Earth. They were called "crystal radios" or
"crystal sets". They worked perfectly producing
free electricity - only that in small amounts.
In fact these were the only devices mass
produced on the Earth so-far, which did not
require any battery nor external energy supply,
but in spite of this still correctly performed their
functions. They did this because they contained
a primitive version of the "telekinetic cell"
embedded into their electronic circuitry - which
cell scientifically, intentionally, and in an aware
manner, was invented only by me in 1989, and
the design of which I described on this web page.
Unfortunately, the philosophical immaturity of
representatives of official so-called "atheistic
orthodox science" induced detrimental explanations
for the lack of need to use external electricity
supply for these old "crystal radios" to sustain
their operation. Namely, these atheistic scientists
disseminate completely absurd claim, that supposedly
such "crystal radios" retrieved energy that they
need from their antennas. But, as this was revealed
by my literature searches carried out for almost
a quarter of century, NO-ONE in the entire
world, took the trouble to actually measure with
instruments the energy balance and "efficiency"
of these "crystal radios", and to empirically prove
that their consumption of power from the antenna
really covers the loss of energy that occurs in
their headphones. (Even if somewhere someone
carried out such measurements, their results were
well "buried" away, so practically almost no-one
in the entire world had a chance to learn them
before December 2011, when measurements of
this balance and "efficiency" were completed from
my initiative.) In other words, all these claims
of "atheistic orthodox scientists", my superiors
at universities, people discussing my inventions,
etc., which for almost a quarter of century
hold back the building of the extremely needed
"telekinetic cells", and which cost me indescribably
high amount of personal suffering, disappointments,
and bad emotions, actually are "sucked from a
finger" and are based just on "beliefs" of some
"armchair ay-stay-nesses".
For a long I have been aware, that experimental
measurement of the energy balance and "efficiency"
of "crystal radios" is a most simple way of proving
that inventors of these radios, without knowing it,
included a primitive version of my "telekinetic cell"
into circuitry of these radios. After all, if (what actually
happened in 2011) the experimentally determined
"efficiency" of these crystal radios turned out to
be greater than 100% (i.e. turned out to exceed
100% announced by the official science as supposedly
"impassable" value of the highest-possible energy
"efficiency"), than this must mean that every crystal
radio generates by itself the
electricity that it consumes. But if the experimentally
measured "efficiency" of crystal radios would turn
to be lower than 100%, then this would mean that
these radios really work like "atheistic orthodox scientists"
tell this to naive people - i.e. that their operation is
sustained due to energy absorbed from antennas.
Therefore for many years I tried to persuade these
people who have required condition, equipment, and
knowledge, to carry out experimental measurements
of this "efficiency" of crystal radios. This is because
I was completely deprived of possibilities to carry out
such measurements by myself - as I am explaining this
more extensively e.g. in item #J1 of the web page named
fe_cell.htm.
Unfortunately, until December 2011, means for long
22 years since I scientifically and in aware manner
invented the "telekinetic cell", no-one volunteered for
completion of such measurements - in spite that I
persistently promoted them in internet and in a number
of other my publications. Only in December 2011 -
for my huge happiness, a "radio-person" from Poland
volunteered to carry out such measurements. His
results and
measurements have proven
an "astronomical" efficiency of "crystal radios", which
exceeded supposedly "impassable" efficiency of 100%
by so high value, that in no-case it could be e.g. just
an "error in measurements".
In other words, to-date experimental measurements
of "efficiency" of crystal radios proved beyond doubts,
that these radios generate by themselves electricity
required for their operation, and that the power
taken from their antennas represents just a kind
of "trigger" which releases in crystal radios the
process of automatic generation of energy.
Descriptions of the method and results of experimental
measurements of "efficiency" of crystal radios is
presented in "part #J" from the separate web page named
fe_cell.htm.
I encourage readers to have a look at these presentations.
After all, they "open our eyes", prove to everyone
who wishes to carry out required measurements, that
a device with energy efficiency of over 100% can be
build - so that it generates "free energy" without consuming
any fuel or other kind of energy, and also these
measurements are so thoroughly explained, that more
capable readers can repeat them - thus "convince
themselves conclusively".
Now, when indicated was a simple experiment
and a simple device, which allow to generate
more energy than they consume, it should be
enough to just improve appropriately these old
prototypes of "crystal radios" in order to receive
"telekinetic cells" of my invention providing us with
abundance of energy and electrical power. So let us
"roll-up our sleeves" and begin the work, because
without these devices our civilisation slowly is
dying. In items #H1 to #H3 of this separate web named
fe_cell.htm
is explained, step by step, how in the most
simple and fastest manner we can transform a
"crystal radio" in such a way, that the circuitry
of this radio becomes converted into a "telekinetic
cell" which generates an unlimited abundance
of "free electricity".
Finally on the planet Earth arrived the right
time when the research and development
on the telekinetic cell become a necessity.
Therefore readers who have appropriate
conditions for development and experimenting,
should try their luck in building this device.
Much more extensive description of it, which
also includes guidelines for these hobbyists
who wish to build it, are provided on the web page named
fe_cell.htm - about research and development of telekinetic cells.
But please notice,
that onto production of the "telekinetic cells" of
my invention, are imposed 3 requirements, which
stem from my authorship of principles of operation
and design of "telekinetic cells", and thus also from
my intellectual ownership of that invention. These
3 requirements are summarised in item #H1 of
the separate web page named
fe_cell.htm
Part #D:
Telekinetic "influenz-maschine":
#D1.
What is this telekinetic influenz-maschine:
Telekinetic influenzmaschines are first successful
"free energy" devices build on our planet,
which actually work and produce an abundance
of free electricity. They are currently owned
by the Swiss Religious Community calling itself
the "Methernitha". Unfortunately, for reasons
which I am trying to explain in chapter OD of my
monograph [1/5],
Methernitha is determined to keep secret the
technical details, as well as the history of these
extraordinary devices. In 1991 I flew from New
Zealand to Methernitha especially to see this
extraordinary device. Regrettably, at that time
Methernitha already implemented the iron rule
to not show this machine to anyone (it was being
shown to every interested person just a few years
earlier). So my only benefit from that visit was
to meet in person Paul Baumann - the technical
genius who actually constructed the Thesta Distatica.
Thus the history (and also the operation) of telekinetic
influenzmaschines that I am describing on this
web page and in my publications, originate from
my chance findings and also from my personal
research on the technically induced :Telekinetic
Effect", not from the Methernitha itself. This means
that I believe that the information that I am providing
here is probably correct, although I have no means
to verify the correctness of it. Thus I would suggest
to treat it only as a "gossip", which gives some taste
of the strange fate of the most vital technical development
of our civilisation.
Fig. #D1: The appearance of telekinetic influenzmaschine.
#D2.
History of telekinetic influenz-maschines:
By a strange coincident I learned that the first
developer of telekinetic influenzmaschines was
an Austrian citizen named Bela Brosan. He constructed the first two
such devices, which actually worked successfully. His breakthrough
devices had a single spinning disk, and were based on principles
of the Töpler electrostatic machine. He also published a small booklet
[1LA2.3.1] (editorial details referred in subsection LA2.3.1 from my
monograph [1/5]),
in which he described these devices. Unfortunately, soon after
constructing his two small devices, Bela Brosan died (supposedly
in quite suspicious circumstances - probably secretly assassinated
by the "curse of inventors" described in item #H1 below - which curse
is trying to suppress the mastery of "free energy" on the Earth). In turn
his two working free energy devices were shipped to Switzerland by his
helper called "Nitschel", who was known around from his "golden hands"
skills, as well as from his radical religious views for which he even run
into problems with local authorities. It was supposedly from this Nitschel,
that the religious community Methernitha got hold of the first two these devices.
Methernitha keeps them in the working order until today, sometimes showing
them to the carefully selected people. They are called "Testatica".
Later, by using the Brosan's working model, Methernitha build another,
the third such device with two rotating disks. It was called the
"Thesta-Distatica". It worked perfectly and proved itself so successful
in operation, that Methernitha initiated the project of building a huge
version of it with two disks over 2 meters in diameters. For my best
knowledge this large free energy project is still being continued even
today. More details regarding the extraordinary history of telekinetic
influenzmaschines is provided in subsection LA2.3.1 from volume
10 of my
monograph [1/5],
downloadable free of charge from this web site.
There is a fact, which hit my eyes when I visited
Methernitha in 1991, and which is conclusively
disclosing who is behind this "curse of inventors"
described in item #H1 below - which makes
impossible for our civilisation to master "free
energy devices" already now. Namely when
I talked to Paul Baumann (the constructor of
"Thesta-Distatica") near the gate to the building
of Methernitha in which research on telekinetic
influenzmaschines is carried out, I was shocked
by tens of magnetically scorched rings of grass
that were present on a nearby paddock. In fact
this paddock was so covered with scorched rings
of grass, as that one shown in Figure V1(c) in
monograph [1/5].
In turn, from research on identical rings of
scorched vegetation that exist in New Zealand,
it is known to me that exactgly such rings are
formed during landings of "simulations" of UFO
vehicles. This means, that UFOnauts are extremely
interested in fate of telekinetic influenzmaschines.
So they continually spy on people of Methernitha
and hypnotically program these people to never
release the technology of free energy machines
outside of Methernitha. Means that UFOnauts
are behind this "curse of inventors" described
in item #H1 below, which makes impossible
for humanity to master the production of free
energy devices. (For more information about
"simulations" of UFOnauts continually pushing
our civilisation down, see the web page
ufo.htm,
or see chapter OD from volume 13 of monograph
monograph [1/5].
#D3.
Components of telekinetic influenz-maschines:
The basic part of every telekinetic
influenzmaschine is a spinning disk
with 50 electrodes (for the USA it must
have 60 electrodes, as the North America
uses AC electricity of frequency 60 Hz).
This disk is visible on all illustrations of
these devices. In order to make it spin
at constant speed of around 60 RPM
(means at the speed of 1 revolution per
second), the disk is a part of an electrostatic
motor that works on principles which are
the reversal of principles from the Töpler
electrostatic machine, or from the Wimshurst
electrostatic machine. Another vital component
of every telekinetic influenzmaschine is
a telekinetic cell described earlier in item
#C1 of this web page. This cell is controlled
with electric impulses generated by the spinning
disk. (I.e. these 50 electrodes of the disk
spinning with the rotational velocity of 1
revolution per second, are the starting components
which generate 50 Hz impulses for the pulser
of the telekinetic cell.)
#D4.
Operation of telekinetic influenz-maschines:
In the sense of principles involved
in their operation, telekinetic influenzmaschines are actually
duplex devices composed of two mutually cooperating components.
The first of this components is an electrostatic motor, which works
on principles of electrostatic influence. Means this motor uses principles
of operation that are exact reversals of principles utilised in either
the Töpler machine, or in the Wimshurst electrostatic machine. (As you
probably know, in electricity principles of motors and generators
are mutually reversible. This means that principles applied in
every electric motor can be reversed so that they produce a
generator of electricity. Also principles of every electricity
generator can be so reversed that they produce an electric motor.
This reversibility applies to principles utilised in the Töpler
and the Wimshurst machines.)
The second component of telekinetic influenzmaschines is a
telekinetic cell described before in item #C1 of this
web page. This cell generates free electricity which is
used for sustaining the motion of the motor. Both together, means the
motor and the telekinetic cell, form a telekinetic influenzmaschine
which not only produces a visible mechanical motion without the need
for any energy supply, but also produces a surplus of free electricity
which later can be supplied to other electrical appliances in order
to power them.
Earlier on this page, while describing telekinetic
cells I also mentioned, that in order to make these
cells work, a series of electrical impulses of the
constant frequency 50 Hz for Europe and 60 Hz
for the USA must be supplied to their entry. In order
to generate these impulses, telekinetic cells include
a special component called the "pulser". These
impulses are later reinforced by the Telekinetic
Effect released in inductors (I1) and (I2).
In telekinetic influenzmaschines these impulses
are generated by the electrostatic motor described
before. To generate them, the motor used in Europe
must have a disk with 50 electrodes (the disk used
in the USA must have 60 electrodes). This disk must
rotate with the constant rotational velocity of 60 rotations
per minute (RPM) - means 1 revolution per second.
The result is, that if in front of this disk we place the
"impulses' collecting head" marked "ho" on Figures
"Fig. #D2" and "Fig. #D3" (or LA5 and LA6 from [1/5]),
a series of AC impulses of frequency 50 Hz in Europe
(or 60 Hz in the USA) are induced in this head. Thus,
this head "ho", together with electrodes of the spinning
disk, represents a "pulser" for the telekinetic cell. If now
these 50 (or 60) Hz impulses we feed from this collecting
head the telekinetic battery, the battery is going to
telekinetically generate 50 Hz AC electricity for Europe,
or 60 Hz for the USA. A part of this AC electricity must
be redirected back to the electrostatic motor to supply
it into energy and thus to keep it rotating. The rest can
be supplied outside of the device and directly utilised
in our home appliances. And this is how telekinetic
influenzmaschines do work. Of course to construct them,
we must solve several technical problems. One of
these is the maintenance of the constant speed of 60
RPM at the rotating disk. On the accuracy of this constant
speed depends the frequency of free electricity being
generated. To solve this problem, it is necessary to
add special "speed controller" to the design of the
electrostatic motor. This controller is formed through
linking mechanically the electric motor used as the
main part of telekinetic influenzmaschines, with an
additional small spinning spindle which holds a small
controlling dynamo-motor. This dynamo-motor has
the "opposing" electrical connection (i.e. the positive
feedback) with the main motor of the telekinetic
influenzmaschine. In Figure "Fig. #D3" (or LA6 from
[1/5]) this controlling dynamo-motor is marked as "Ts".
This dynamo-motor causes, that when the main
motor runs too fast, the "Ts" begins to work as a dynamo,
means starts to generate electricity that counteracts the electricity which
propels the main motor, thus slowing this main motor down. In turn when the
main motor runs too slow, this "Ts" dynamo-motor switches itself onto the
operation as an additional small electric motor, which adds rotational
power to the influenzmaschine, thus causing the disk to rotate much
faster.
Note that the original inventor and developer of
telekinetic influenzmaschines (i.e. Bela Brosan)
was to produce with them the free mechanical
motion, not the free electrical energy. However,
later users of these devices had no clue about
principles and phenomena involved in their
operation. So they were unable to extract the
telekinetic cell from the entire telekinetic influenzmaschine,
to generate electricity much simpler with this cell alone.
#D5.
If you are one of developers:
Numerous people attempted to replicate
the telekinetic influenzmaschine called
"Thesta Distatica" - this one shown in Figure
"Fig. #B1" above (or LA4 from [1/5]). Unfortunately,
so-far all these people failed. In fact,
even the Methernitha - which actually
have already three working models of
telekinetic influenzmaschines, experiences
unbreakable difficulties in replicating them
at a large-scale. The reason is, that all these
people try to mimic the components and
the physical structure of the original "Testatica" or "Thesta-Distatica"
devices, without actually understanding how these devices work
and what principles they employ. So if you are one of these people experimenting
with free energy, please do not repeat the same error. Start your developments
from actual learning and understanding how free energy devices in general,
while telekinetic influenzmaschines in particular, do work. Only then
replicate in your own device their principles of operation, instead of
thoughtless mimicking their physical structure and components. Only
in such a case you may succeed. And we all wait for your success,
because we all desperately need free energy.
Fig. #D2: Major components of telekinetic
influenzmaschines. The list of these components
and their operations are explained in subsection
LA2.3.3 from volume 10 of
monograph [1/5].
Some of these components are described on this
web page, when principles of operation of telekinetic
influenzmaschines and telekinetic cells are being
explained.
(The above photograph originates from
monograph [1/5]
where it is shown on Figure LA5 "b".)
Fig. #D4: The photo from this Figure presents me (i.e.
Dr Jan Pajak)
holding the brand new Wimshurst electrostatic machine
that I purchased in Poland for around $100 in a shop
then called CEZAS, that supplied schools with teaching
aids.
(The above photograph originates from
monograph [6/2]
where it is shown on Figure 11.) This Wimshurst
electrostatic machine can be converted into an
electrostatic motor, which in turn can be supplemented
with a telekinetic cell (described in item #C1 of this web
page) which supplies this motor with electricity, and
together they can be used as the main component
of a telekinetic influenzmaschine. Actually I purchased
the above machine with the intention that I convert
it into a telekinetic influenzmaschine. At the time of
this purchase I still was doing open and non-camouflaged
research on the Telekinetic Effect and on free energy
devices at the University that I was then lecturing.
I also still believed, that I may build over there one
of free energy devices that I invented and worked
out at that time.
By the way, note the most prominent cluster of
buildings right behind me - at the level of my
shoulder blades. These are from the university
campus where I actually invented telekinetic
cells and explained the operation of free energy
devices presented on this web page. This university
is the site of my first (hopelessly lost) battle with
orthodox scientists regarding the inclusion of free
energy devices and the Telekinetic Effect, into the
area of interests of the mainstream science. I intended
to build at this university my free energy devices in order
to prove that they actually work. I also intended to present
papers and articles about these wonder devices. Unfortunately,
my superiors from that university disallowed me to present even my
first research paper on these devices on a scientific conference
in Australia, in spite that this paper went through referees and
was accepted for the conference. According to the opinion of
my superiors, the paper supposedly run against established
canons of the present science (referees which reviewed my paper
on the behalf of organisers of this conference did not think so).
Also soon after I finished purchases of components for my
free energy devices and was just about to start their physical
construction, I lost my lecturing job in 1990, thus making
impossible to carry out any further research and development
on these wonder devices. The paper that I was disallowed
to present, was later converted into a scientific treatise.
Now it constitutes a major part of
monograph [6]
on "free energy" available through this web page.
In turn this strange coincidence in timing of my loss
of the lecturing job on that university, and my invention
of the "telekinetic cell", implanted an idea into my mind,
that perhaps some sort of a
curse of inventors
works this planet, which tries to prevent our civilisation
from constructing these wonder devices now and from
mastering now the "free energy". My later research
confirmed this idea, proving that practically all outstanding
inventors and all breakthrough inventions are
persecuted by a mysterious "curse of inventors"
described in a larger number of details in item #H1 below,
as well as in a number of other my web pages - for
example in item #B4.4 from the web page named
mozajski_uk.htm - about the inventor of the first airplane in the world,
in item #G3 from a separate web page
eco_cars.htm - about pollution-free cars,
in item #K3 from a separate web page
fe_cell.htm - about telekinetic cells,
and in several other web pages.
This "curse of inventors" either assassinates developers
of free energy devices - as it probably did to the
Austrian, Bela Brosan (i.e. the builder of first
telekinetic influenzmaschines), or it locks
operational such devices in power of some
impenetrable communities - as it probably did
with two "Testatica" and with one "Thesta-DIstatica"
influenzmaschines, or it continually persecutes
researchers who investigate "free energy devices" -
as it for sure is doing to me since the time of
inventing these devices (for more details on this,
see subsection OD from volume 13 of
monograph [1/5].)
It is worth to know about the existence of this
"curse of inventors" (described in item #H1 below),
because every developer who attempts the
construction of "free energy devices" and
is close to a success, always encounters
numerous obstacles that this
curse of inventors
places on his or her path.
#D6.
How to build a telekinetic influenzmaschine:
The simplest manner of
building a telekinetic influenzmaschine is to start from
constructing an AC motor working on principles of
electrostatic influence. Such a motor needs
to be simply a reversal of either the Töpler machine, or
the Wimshurst electrostatic machine. Actually such a motor
can be purchased almost ready made, as many countries,
including Poland, offer brand new Winshurst electrostatic
machines for sale in shops. These ready-made
machines look as it is shown in "Fig. #D4" above (or 11 in [6/2]).
The problem is, however, that the Töpler and the Wimshurst machines
both work as electrostatic generators. Namely they produce
static electricity while consuming mechanical motion.
To convert them into influence motors, it is necessary
to reverse their principles of operation. So they must
be able to produce motion when their capacitors are
supplied with AC electricity. After we have such an electrostatic
motor working, we need to use one electrode from it as a pulser.
Means we catch the electric impulses that this motor
generates, with the brush marked "ho" on illustrations
"Fig. #D2" and "Fig. #D3" above (or LA5 and LA6 in [1/5]).
Then we feed these impulses into a separate telekinetic cell
that we attach to our motor. These impulses are going to
make our telekinetic cell work. So we can feed now the output
from this telekinetic cell back into the capacitors of our motor.
In this way we receive a duplex operation of the resultant
device, composed of the electrostatic motor, and the
telekinetic cell. In this duplex operation the motor
produces electric impulses which sustain the operation
of the telekinetic cell, in turn the telekinetic cell
generates electricity which sustains the operation of
the motor. So the resultant device is going to operate
exactly the same as does the Thesta Distatica shown previously
in "Fig. #B1" (or LA4 in [1/5]). (This practically means that
the description that I am providing here is also a description
of the true operation of the Thesta Distatica constructed
by the Swiss religious community "Methernitha".)
Our device is to produce mechanical motion, plus plenty of
free electricity, the excess of which can be utilised by
us for supplying other electrical appliances.
Finally on the planet Earth arrived the right
time when the research and development
on devices of telekinetics become a necessity.
Therefore readers who have appropriate
conditions for development and experimenting
should try their luck in building such devices.
Much more extensive description of these
devices, which also includes guidelines for
these hobbyists who wish to build them, are
provided on a different web page
telekinetics.htm - about the experimental construction of devices for telekinetics.
The Telekinetic Effect can also be utilised
to generate various other forms of "free energy"
than just electricity. There are devices already
build and tested in action, which utilise the
"reversal of friction" capabilities of this effect
for converting environmental thermal energy
into energies other than electricity. For example,
on the web page named
eco_cars.htm
are described devices which generate chemical
energy by converting environmental heat into
products of dissociation of water to hydrogen
and oxygen - which gases then can be burned
as fuels in "cars run on water". There are also
free energy devices which produce heat.
Several out of these are comprehensively
described on a separate web page named
boiler.htm.
This last application of the Telekinetic Effect
allows to construct telekinetic heaters, which
have the efficiency exceeding 100% - see
item #E8 below.
In this part of the web page I am going to describe
briefly a heater, the inventor of which claimed
that it has the energy efficiency reaching 2000%.
This means that if properly constructed and
tuned, it would consume the amount of electrical
energy that represents only around 5% of the
total energy that it produces in the form of heat.
The inventor of this heater is the late Peter Daysh DAVEY (Senior)
of Christchurch, New Zealand. Ufortunately, later
research completed by a Polish hobbyist and
described on a separate web page named
boiler.htm,
revealed that this huge claimed efficiency
cannot be confirmed by measurements, and
thus perhaps may just be an error in judgement.
However, the fact remains, that the so-called "curse
of inventors" described in item #H1 of this web page
generates an immensely huge force to prevent this
"Davey's heater" from being implemented. In turn the
"curse of inventors" works intelligently in such a manner
that it holds back the implementation of an invention with
the force which is proportional to the significance
of that invention to our civilisation. This in turn suggests
(according to the content of item #H4 below on this
web page), that the "Davey's heater" for sure hides
some vital secret, the discovery and research of which
are to bring about to our civilisation (and also to the
person and nation that is to implement this heater)
some huge benefits and immense advancement of
civilisation. No wonder that in spite of results of
measurements of that Polish hobbyist, still I am
contacted by people who claim that they already
constructed this heater and that according to their
estimates their heating of homes with it, is much
cheaper then e.g. the use of "heat pumps".
The design of the Davey's telekinetic heater
is extremely simple. It actually is composed
of two major parts only – see "Fig. #E2" (or
LA8 (3) from monograph
monograph [1/5]).
The most important out of these two parts is
a resonating hemispherical bowl (1) made
of a sound inducing metal plate. The second
part is a buffering hemispherical bowl (2)
almost identical in shape to the bowl (1). This
second bawl has the radius around 4 to 6 mm
larger than the resonating hemispherical bowl
(1). Both bowls are assembled symmetrically one around the other, means
the hemispherical bowl (1) is placed inside of the hemispherical bowl (2). Of
course, apart from these two bowls, the heater also includes a long pipe (8)
which holds remaining parts together, two nuts (5) and (3) which fix both
bowls in their proper locations, a washer (4) which allows to regulate the
mutual distance "L" between both bowls, and electrical wires (6) and (7)
which supply electricity to both bowls and allow the heater to be submerged
into water that it heats. But these other parts are marginal additions only.
The major parts are the bowls. During experimental production of this heater,
the resonating hemispherical bowl (1) usually is made from an old cover for
a bicycle bell. The dimensions of this hemispherical bowl are not important.
It is only vital that it falls into a sonic resonance at the frequency of 50
Hertz, and that it has the outer surface which is parallel and equidistant
from the external buffering hemispherical bowl (2). To each of these two bowls
a different wire of the household electricity supply (i.e. 220 V, 50 Hz)
is connected. The heater must be submerged in water that it heat. It brings
water to the boiling point extremely fast. More details about the design
and operation of this telekinetic heater is provided in subsection LA3.3
from volume 10 of monograph
monograph [1/5].
After being constructed, the Davey's telekinetic
heater must be "tuned" in two different manners. The first tuning depends on
providing the hemispherical bowl (1) with such frequency of the own oscillations,
that makes this bowl to resonate acoustically when a sound of the frequency 50 Hertz
is emitted nearby. The second tuning of the heater depends on appropriate selecting
the distance "L" between both bowls (1) and (2). On this distance depends the
formation of the standing wave between both bowls. Thus it decides about the
energy efficiency of the entire heater.
The principle of operation of this telekinetic
heater is quite similar to the principle of operation of the telekinetic battery
explained before. Namely the Telekinetic Effect is released in it due to the
acceleration and deceleration of magnetic field. The magnetic field that is
accelerated, is the one that is generated by the electric current which flows
through water between both bowls. In turn the acceleration of this field is
accomplish through sonic vibrations of the inner bowl. The required asymmetry
of the vibrations of the field, which is required to generate the Telekinetic
Effect, and which in the telekinetic battery is caused by permanent magnets inside
of coils, in this heater is provided by the curvature of the bowls. Thus the
inner hemispherical bowl in this heater is doing the same job as the inductor
(I1) is doing in the telekinetic cell.
Fig. #E1: The telekinetic immersion heater invented
during the World War Two (in 1944) by the New Zealand
fighter pilot and musician named Peter Daysh Davey.
The main component which releases the Telekinetic
Effect in this heater, is the inner resonance bowl visible
on the very right side, as it sticks out from the outer
buffering bowl. (The old New Zealand 50 cents coin,
visible on this photo, is 32 mm in diameter. In August
2006 these coins were withdrawn from circulation.)
This mechanically simple device generates many times
more heat, than the amount of electrical energy that
it consumes. Thus it has the energy efficiency of
significantly exceeding 100%. It is probably one of
the most simple free energy devices in existence.
It was proven in action and subjected to measurements
by numerous scientists. However, the mass production
of it was purposely blocked by the means of bureaucratic
obstacles - for details see the "curse of inventors"
described, amongst others, in item #H1 of this web
page, and also in item #G3 from the web page named
eco_cars.htm,
in item #K3 of the web page named
fe_cell.htm,
and in several other web pages listed before.
(The above photograph originates from
monograph [1/5]
where it is shown on Figure LA8.)
Fig. #E2: The above drawing illustrates the general
design and main components of the telekinetic heater
of Mr Davey. Notice that it can easily be enlarged
by clicking onto it.
Descriptions of subsequent components of this heater
are provided in subsection LA3.3 from volume 10 of
monograph [1/5].
(The above illustration originates from
monograph [1/5]
where it is shown as part (3) on Figure LA8 - courtesy "szod".)
Symbols: (1) - a "resonating bowl" which is to be
connected to the "life wire" of the electricity supply,
(2) - a "buffering bowl" which is to be connected to
the "neutral wire" (also called the "return wire") of
50 Hz electricity supply, (3) and (5) - two nuts which
fix both bowls in their proper locations, (4) - a washer
which allows to regulate the mutual distance "L"
between both bowls during the second stage of
tuning of the heater for the energy consumption
(this distance should be around L = 4 to 6 mm),
(6) - the electrical wire which connects the "life wire"
of 50 Hz electricity supply with the "resonating
bowl" (1), (7) - the electrical wire which collects
electricity from the "buffering bowl" (2) and sends
the current to the "neutral wire" (also called the
"return wire") of the 50 Hz electricity supply, (8) -
a long assembly pipe means a kind of "frame"
for this heater which holds remaining parts together.
* * *
If you wish to shift
a given Figure (i.e. a photograph or a drawing),
means to move it into another part of the screen
where you are just reading a description of it,
you need to do as follows: (1) click on it to make it appear
in another window, (2) the "downsize" this another
window (with a given photograph or drawing) through
"grabbing" its right-bottom corner with your mouse
and then dragging this corner upwards-left to receive
the size of this different window that you wish to have
(notice that since you downsize a first such a Figure,
all next Figures clicked on will appear already
downsized - unless you enlarge them in the reversed manner),
and then (3) drag this another window with the picture
that you wish to relocate to the area of this web page where
you wish to look at it (to move it, you just grab it with
your mouse by the blue stripe on the top of it).
Notice also that if you scroll (with scroll bars) the
text of the page when you read it, this another window
(with the drawing) will disappear. In order to return it
into the new position, you need to click on its "icon"
(i.e. on the "program's button" from the taskbar) in
the lowest part of the screen.
#E2.
The energy efficiency of this heater:
The inventor of the Davey's heater claimed,
that it was experimentally proved to shift to
the heated water many times more thermal
energy than the amount of electrical energy
it consumes. I myself did not research the
energy efficiency of this heater. However,
from the information that the inventor repeated
to me, I gather that the measurements carried
out by New Zealand scientists suggested that
this heater may consume even less than the
equivalent for around 5% of the energy that
it generates in form of heat. This would indicate,
that the electrical efficiency of this heater
would be around 2000%. (Means, that the
heater would produce over 20 times more
heat than it consumes electrical energy.)
In turn so huge efficiency of this heater
would allow it to be used for constructing
the so-called "perpetum mobile" (means to
e.g. evaporate water with this heater, use
the steam that it produces to run a steam
engine, while the motion from the steam
engine use to generate electricity which
would supply the heater with the energy
required to evaporate water, etc., etc.)
Several orthodox scientific institutions in
New Zealand supposedly had a very hard
time to explain on the basis of today physics
what is the reason for this supposed over
100% efficiency of this device. After all,
it would contradict all known laws of
thermodynamics. Finally one of these
institutions (i.e. the New Zealand DSIR)
got an idea, or rather an accusation, that
this heater instead of the electric current
may consume the so-called "cosine fi" -
i.e. the abstract quantity that represents
a phase shift between the pulsations of
the voltage and pulsations of the amperage
in the alternating current. This particular
parameter is immeasurable with the standard
electrical instruments. But even the specialized
measurements and research carried out by
these scientists have not confirmed this claim
(accusation). Still, in spite that it was never
confirmed experimentally that this heater
actually consumes the "cosine fi", due to
insisting on this explanation, the authority
of the orthodox science was saved.
The later research completed by a Polish hobbyist
revealed, that this huge efficiency of the heater
cannot be confirmed with measurements, and
thus probably is just an error in judgement which
results from the fact that the heater "makes an
impression" that it already boiled water almost
immediately after it is inserted into this water.
But in reality this impression may result from the
formation by it gases and steam bubbles even
when the water is still almost cold. Measurements
of this Polish hobbyist suggest, that probably
the energy efficiency for this heater is similar
like for resistance heaters. Unfortunately, the
measurements that this Polish hobbyist make,
were based on the "specific heat". On the other
hand, measurements based on the "specific
evaporation heat" can yield different results.
After all, benefits and cheapness of the use
of that heater reveal themselves when it is
applied to heating the home, not when it brings
water to boiling. But in order to measure such
its efficiency during evaporating of water (for
the use in homes' heating), a new method
of measuring would need to be developed
(which method, as so-far, remains unknown) - for
more details see the separate web page named
boiler.htm.
It is also worth to add, that the same research
by the Polish hobbyist revealed as well, that even
with the energy efficiency close to 100%, this
heater - after appropriate modification of its
design and principles of operation, probably
is to introduce an immense progress to our
civilisation.
#E3.
Potentials for causing a scientific revolution:
All data suggest, that the Davey's heater
hides potentials for causing a real revolution
in the Earth's science and technology. The
reason is that it unleashes the technically
induced telekinesis, that it creates phenomena
that cannot be explained by orthodox science
to-date, and also that it allows to accomplish
effects that so-far were considered to be
"impossible" - e.g. effectively transforms
water into hydrogen. This means that a
popular use of this heater would inspire
new areas of research and new quest
for answers. Therefore, should this
extraordinary heater be put into mass
production at the time when the inventor
intended it, means in 1945, by now it would
completely turn upside down the human
science and technology. So the technically
induced telekinesis, instead of being
explained by myself only in 1989, would
actually be explained by some other scientist
at least 40 years earlier. In turn the explanation
of principles of technical telekinesis, would
lead to the development of telekinetic propulsion
systems, of the type used in the
Magnocraft
described on my web pages
telekinesis.htm - about the phenomenon of telekinesis and
propulsion.htm - about the propulsion of Magnocrafts.
It would also inspire our understanding of human telekinesis (psycho-kinesis)
and attributes of the human mind which induce human version of telekinetic
motion.
Fig. #E3: Mr Davey (this distinguish gentlemen with a beard),
photographed with me (i.e. with
Dr Jan Pajak)
in 1990. (Click on this photograph to see it enlarged.)
Mr Davey holds a kind "world record" in the fight with
"bureaucracy"
for the permission to implement his boiler to
an industrial production. After all, since 1944
(in which year he invented his boiler) till 2008
(in which year he explained in the news report,
described here in item #E6, that he still fights
for the implementation of his boiler to a factory
production) already over 60 years have passed.
More about his unique "world record" is written
in item #B3.1 from a separate web page
newzealand.htm - about New Zealand.
In turn the extraordinary boiler of his invention
is described not only on this web page, but even
more comprehensively on another web page
boiler.htm - about the revolutionary boiler which bits all possible records.
The boiler of Mr Davey was publicised in 2008
in the article entitled "Sax notes lead to off-beat boiler",
on page A13 of the New Zealand newspaper
from Christchurch, named
The Press,
issue dated on Wednesday, January 30, 2008.
At the beginning of February 2008 the text of this
article was also accessible in Internet under the
address
http://www.stuff.co.nz/thepress/4379593a6530.html.
#E4.
Persecution of the inventor:
The story of the invention of this heater is
both, very inspiring, and also very sad. Mr Davey was a musician who volunteered
to defend freedom and his country as a fighter pilot during the World War Two. He
took part in the Battle for Britain. Fighter aeroplanes of that time had propellers
and engines, which during acrobatics of aerial battles were making the pilots cabin
to vibrate at various frequencies. As a sensitive musician Mr Davey noticed, that
there was such a frequency of the motor and propeller buzzing, when the aeroplane
cabin and his body were getting into a resonance. At this unique resonance frequency he
always was experiencing an influx of heat in his aeroplane cabin. He did not
know yet, that in future this phenomenon will be utilised in ultrasonic weapon
systems for effective and undetected killing of people. But he decided to test
whether the same phenomenon is to appear, if a metal hemisphere which simulates
his pilot cabin is submerged in water and is excited into a resonance frequency
of an AC current. So he found two tops from old
bicycle bells, joined them together, tuned one of them to 50 Hz frequency, attached
electricity wire to each one of them, and thrown them into water. Surprisingly,
water started to boil extremely fast. So he made his first heater patent
based on this observation. This patent was already registered in 1944.
After a hero return from the war, he had a
device, which repetitively proved to everyone who measured it, that it has the
efficiency decisively exceeding 100%. Realising this, he believed that the world is
going to pounce on the opportunity of production and use of this technical miracle.
After all, people are full of declarations about apparent saving on energy, resources,
about protection of our natural environment, etc. However, the reality turned out
to be completely opposite. Immediately after it was experimentally confirmed that
the device has unexplainably high efficiency, the heater and the inventor fell
into disfavour of various institutions that are interested in selling electricity
and that protect the monopoly on electrical power. In the result, this extraordinary
invention received an extraordinary treatment! Namely authorities were doing everything
in their powers to disallow the production and sale of this heater in New Zealand.
One of legal tricks that were used against this heater, was that it was declared
officially to be "unsafe to health and life of users". (Please notice that practically
every electrical device working on 220 Volts can be declared unsafe, if someone in
the position of authority wishes to put it down.) In turn in New Zealand it is
impossible to undertake the production and sale of anything, that is not officially
approved by the government. In the result, Mr Davey was fighting for almost 50 years
to receive a permit for the industrial production of this heater. And during these almost
50 years, the permission was continually refused to him, no matter what research
outcomes he submitted to please authorities, and no matter how hard he tried.
But it is interesting, that in Australia an electric jug with a heating element
of the design very similar to the Davey’s heater was put in mass production (this
Australian jug most probably is produced in there still even today). This Australian
jug is working on the principle of electrical resistance of water (i.e. not telekinesis
as the heater of Mr Davey does). Water that it heats is a resistor, in which heat
is generated because of the electric current flows through this water.
This Australian jug is exactly the same "dangerous to the health and lives", like
the telekinetic heater of Mr Davey. Only that it did not encountered in Australia
similar bureaucratic resistance because the energy efficiency of it is "normal".
When I met Mr Davey for the first time in 1990,
he still was appealing to authorities, and still had a hope to receive a permit
for the production of his heater - in spite of these almost 50 years of lost battles
with bureaucrats. He was even showing to me a large stock of components he
gathered to start a production immediately after the permit is granted to him.
However, he gave up the experimental production of research copies of his heater.
Even the heater he was using by himself, was then already broken and he had no
the will to repair it (this broken heater is shown
on the photo "Fig. #E1" above). So practically
I had no pleasure of seeing his heater at work.
However, he run out of his usual optimism when I talked to him for the last time shortly
before I needed to leave New Zealand in 1992 to seek my bread overseas.
Then he was completely destroyed, deprived the will to live, and on the edge of
a nervous breakdown. His most recent appeals were again squashed. He could not
understand then, why offering to the world a breakthrough free energy device of the
experimentally proven efficiency that well exceeds 100%, he receives back only
scoffing, persecution, and bureaucratic plus legal obstacles that make impossible
the production of this miraculous device.
#E5.
Closing my contacts with Mr Davey caused by the demolition of his house in 1998 and disappearance of his name from the telephone book:
In 1998 I returned to New Zealand from
my bread-seeking globetrotting. After the
ruturn I initially lived in Dunedin - means
a city which is distant from Christchurch
by around 360 km. But near the end of
1998 I went into a trip through New Zealand
in search of a job. In this trip I passed
through Christchurch in both directions,
means two times. Of course, each time
I travelled through Christchurch I attempted
to contact Mr Davey. But when passing
through Christchurch for the first time,
I discovered that the home of Mr Davey
was just being demolished. In the day
when I was there, the demolished was
already a half of the house, although the
veranda of it, and also stairs which led to
the flat of Mr Davey, still stood undamaged.
When I was passing there again on my way
back, in the place where his home stood
previously, I found only a large pile of broken
wooden planks mixed with broken bricks.
It looked as if several heavy tanks rolled
through his home. In turn no even a trace
of him. I also was unable to locate anyone,
who would know what actually happened to
him. His name and address disappeared
from the telephone book. So I though that's
the end. After this event I ceased further
visiting his home, although in 1999 I still
went to Christchurch several times. In turn
after 1999, as I explained this in subsection W4 of
monograph [1/5],
it has not been in my fate to let me go to
Christchurch again.
From the silence which then started to prevail
in matters of the Mr Davey's heater I realised
that this heater was gradually forgotten in New
Zealand. It was no any help to it, that the energy
efficiency of this heater was proven at the
miraculous level of many times above 100%.
Also the fate of the inventor himself remained
unknown to me. When I talked to Mr Davey
for the last time, I promised him to publish the
description of his heater and the story of his
lifetime battles, so that perhaps someone else
picks up his fight and puts this miraculous heater
into a mass production. In this way his long
suffering and his brilliant invention would not
be wasted, and would start to work for the good
of our civilisation. Descriptions from the web page
boiler.htm - about the shocking history of revolutionary boiler that bits all records,
and also from this web page, were prepared
as my fulfilment of that old promise.
#E6.
News item in TVNZ 1 on 30 January 2008, at 11:00 pm, which demonstrated the operational boiler of Mr Davey:
Everything that I described on this web page
in above items #E1 to #E5, represents
the state of my knowledge about the boiler
discussed here as for years 1990 to 2007.
However, at the beginning of 2008 it turned
out that the matter of this boiler is continuing.
Namely, on Wednesday, 30 January 2008
at almost exactly 11:00 pm, in the evening
news from channel 1 of the New Zealand
television, a documentary report was broadcasted
about Mr Davey and his boiler. The report
lasted only for around 3 minutes. (The reader
probably can purchase from "TVNZ 1" a disk
DVD with recording of this report.) In this
report almost an instant action of the newest
version of this boiler was demonstrated.
The boiler make water boil in just several
seconds. This report also informed that
Mr Davey is already 92 years old, and that
he still fights for the implementation of this
boiler to a factory production. In this way
his struggle extends to over 60 years - thus
giving to him a kind of "world record".
More about this "world record" is written
in item #B3.1 of the separate web page
newzealand.htm - about New Zealand,
and also on another web page fully
devoted to the description of this boiler,
which page is named
boiler.htm - to inform about this revolutionary boiler which bits all possible world records.
The report also implied that Mr Davey
still lives in Christchurch. In turn this
information allowed me to contact him again -
as I described this more comprehensively
on that separate web page
boiler.htm - about the boiler that bits all possible records.
I managed to notice in this brief news item that
the version of the boiler shown in there solves
already the problem of safety because of which
this boiler previously was refused to get permission
for a factory production. Namely, in this new design
the "buffering bowl" (see "2" in "Fig. #E2"), has already
the form of almost a completely closed sphere - instead
of the hemisphere as the one shown in "Fig. #E2".
To this buffering bowl the "zero" ("ground") wire
of the electricity supply is connected. This causes
that the buffering sphere completely closes the
access to the "resonating bowl" (see "1" on "Fig. #E2"),
to which connected is the supply voltage (i.e. the
life wire of electricity supply). In this way the fully spherical
"buffering bowl" (2) makes impossible to the user
an accidental touching the bowl (1) to which the
supply voltage is connected. This in turn prevents
possibility of accidental electrocuting the user.
I am very interested to see whether, after solving
this problem, Mr Davey manages to implement
this boiler to a factory production. Especially that
the existence of this boiler took as long as until
2008 to be finally revealed to New Zealanders via
the news item in TVNZ 1, and also via the article in
the New Zealand newspaper from Christchurch,
named
The Press,
issue dated on Wednesday, January 30, 2008.
(This article was published
on page A13 of The Press. It was entitled
"Sax notes lead to off-beat boiler". At the
beginning of February 2008 the content
of this article was also available in the Internet
under the address
http://www.stuff.co.nz/4379593a6530.html.)
The heater described here is rather simple
to manufacture. Therefore readers who have
appropriate conditions for experimenting
could easily try their luck in building this device.
Much more extensive description of it, which
also includes guidelines for these hobbyists
who wish to build it, are provided on a different
web page
boiler.htm - about the shocking history of revolutionary boiler that bits all records.
#E8.
The amphora from Pakistan:
At this point I should remind, that the situation
created by the heater described here already
existed once on the Earth. During my professorship
in Cyprus told me this story my student from
Pakistan, in whose family town this situation
took place. Namely, since unknown times until
1950s in Pakistan a metal amphora did exist.
It lied for several centuries in a stream that
flowed through one of palaces in that country.
This amphora continually boiled water which
washed it, without consuming any energy.
Unfortunately it was destroyed by an English
scientist in 1950s, who in the name of science
convinced the local landlord to see what is inside of it.
The scientist cut it apart. It turned out to be empty
inside. However, later he was unable to put it back
together to make it work. The description of this
"amphora from Pakistan" is provided in item
#B2 of the web page
newzealand.htm - about mysteries and curiosities of New Zealand,
and also in item #E4.2 of the web page
boiler.htm - about the shocking history of revolutionary boiler that bits all records.
In turn the principle of operation of this amphora
from Pakistan is explained by phenomena
described in subsection H6.1.3 from volume 4 of
monograph [1/5].
According to my estimates, this principle was almost
identical to the principle of operation of the telekinetic
heater described on this web page.
Only that surfaces of it washed up by hot and cool water
were additionally looped through the oscillatory circuit with
the resonating electrodes of it. Therefore the hot and cold
water which washed these surfaces released the action
of so-called Seebeck Effect, thus generating on these surfaces
electric charges which were needed to supply this amphora
in energy required to its operation.
Part #F:
Generators of mechanical free energy (i.e. energy which takes the form of rotational motion):
#F1.
There is a philosophical justification that "perpetual motion" devices can be build and actually are going to work:
The philosophy of
totalizm
states, that there are significant "discrepancies"
between conclusions derived from philosophical
analyses, and some so-called "laws" of physical
sciences. If the essence of these discrepancies
could be proven correct for findings of philosophy,
then this could cause a kind of revolution in Sciences,
Engineering, and in real life. Let's provide here
a specific example of such a discrepancy, which
in my opinion could be verified experimentally -
e.g. could be proven or disproved with an experiment.
Namely, from the philosophical point of view, the only
difference between e.g. a "windmill" and a "perpetual
motion device", is the length of time in which the
propelling medium provides a steady energy supply
to a given device. So if there exists a "wind" which
blows continually, steadily, and strongly for, let's say,
one million years, then the "windmill" which such a
"wind" would propel, would become a "perpetual motion
device". Thus, from the point of view of any philosophy,
"perpetual motion devices" can be build - if we find
a propelling medium (e.g. a "wind") which provides
a steady energy supply continually for thousands
of years. But the discipline of thermodynamics claims
the exact opposite. It states that "perpetual motion
devices cannot work" at all, as their operation supposedly
would run against the statistic predictions which carry
the name of "laws of thermodynamics". So it would
be an interesting situation if philosophy proves to
thermodynamics that so-called "laws of thermodynamics"
are still incomplete because were NOT consulted
with philosophy. After all, various sciences know
"winds" that "blow" continually and steadily for
millions of years. To indicate here some examples
of such "winds", these include: the rotation of our
planet Earth, the motion of Moon around the Earth,
the magnetic field of the Earth, waves of a "cosmic
noise", various behaviours of elementary particles,
and many more. So if, for example, we construct a
"flywheel", which meets following easy-to-fulfil conditions:
(1) it has the so-called "momentum of inertia" larger
than its "friction torque", (2) it is perfectly balanced - so
that the gravitational field of the Earth does NOT
influence its angular orientation, and (3) it is so
assembled in a given location that the axis of rotation
of this flywheel is exactly parallel to the axis of the
Earth’s rotation; then such a flywheel should create
an everlasting motion in relationship to the Earth,
with the speed of one rotation per day (or more
strictly, this flywheel would remain motionless in
relationship to our solar system, while the Earth
would rotate around it once per each day). So such
a flywheel - if constructed and provided with an
appropriate gearbox linked to a pointer, could prove
empirically that philosophical principles are more
advanced than so-called "laws of thermodynamics".
This in turn would have enormous implications for
all areas of science and technology. For example,
it would provide the society with a rather illustrative
example that philosophy still remains the "mother of
all sciences", and thus it would increase the rate of
employment of graduates of philosophy in all areas
of science and engineering. It would be a perfect
"bridge" that would facilitate cooperation between
Philosophy and Sciences or Engineering. It would
also change our entire civilisation, as it would pave
the way for the development of various principles
that would allow to draw free energy and everlasting
motion from various perpetual "winds". In turn implementation
of these principles would allow the humanity to generate
energy without any consumption of fuels (and thus
also without causing pollution) from phenomena which
currently no scientist have a courage to investigate
because these run at the collision course with "laws
of thermodynamics".
#F2.
So let us verify the philosophical premises by building a flywheel
that operates as a mechanical "perpetual motion" device which
rotates infinitively on principles of the so-called "Coriolis effect":
The philosophical premises described above
indicate that the everlasting rotation of the
Earth represents a kind of "wind" that could
propell a "perpetual motion" device. Therefore
if an excellently balanced heavy flywheel
with good bearings is positioned so that its
axis of rotation is parallel to the axis of the
Earth's rotation, then the Earth is to revolve
in relation to this flywheel, while the
so-called "Coriolis effect" is to maintain the
flywheel in a motionless position in relation
to the rest of the universe (e.g. in relation to
the entire Solar system). In the result, for a
witness who stands on the Earth next to this
flywheel, the wheel is going to behave like a
"perpetual motion" device which makes one
revolution per each day (or a revolution by
15 degrees each hour). Thus, if someone
places a marker on the circumference of
such a flywheel, then its perpetual rotations
can be noticed visually even without the use
of any gearbox which would multiply the
speed of its slow rotational motion. This
flywheel is also able to generate a small
amount of the thrust torque. This thrust torque
is equal to the momentum of inertia of the
wheel itself, minus the momentum of friction
on its bearings, and minus the drag momentum
caused by imperfections in the gravitational
balancing of the flywheel and in positioning
of the axis of rotation perpendicularly to the
Earth's axis of rotation. Thus, the thrust torque
that is generated by this flywheel is able to
generate small amount of useful energy,
e.g. small amount of electricity.
Such a heavy flywheel with good bearings is to
constitute a most simple for constructing, although
highly illustrative kind of perpetual motion (PM)
device that generates mechanical energy in
the form of everlasting rotational movement.
As such, it is going to have an immense historical
significance. It will also generate a breakthrough
in the human thinking about generators of free
energy and about ideas of "perpetual motion".
After all, it will prove that both, such generators
of free energy, as well as perpetual motion
devices, are possible to be build after all, and
in fact they generate energy completely for free.
In this way the flywheel is going to disclose the
intentional misleading hidden behind claims of
the official human science that such devices can
never be build.
In 2004 I visited a tower from the Basilica in Frombork
(Poland). This tower is famous because it was
in it that the Polish astronomical genius, Mikołaj
Kopernik (Nicolas Copernicus) used to work.
During the time of my visit, this tower was turned
into a museum of the physical-astronomical
character. An exhibit from this museum that
especially attracted my attention was a massive
pendulum which illustrated the action of so-called
"Coriolis effect". Namely, the pendulum was
made to swing infinitively. However, apart from
the swinging motion, it also displayed the rotary
motion. The rotational velocity of this rotary motion
amounted to just one rotation per day. In order to
sustain its swinging, the pendulum was continually
supplied with energy impulses. But it did NOT
receive any energy to sustain its rotary motion.
This means, that the rotary motion was sustained
by the energy that it received from the "Coriolis
effect". In other words, that pendulum from the
tower in the Frombork's Basilica was a first
prototype that illustrated the principle of the
perpetually rotating flywheel described here.
Only that, because this pendulum carried
out two kinds of motion simultaneously,
it make impossible the interception of energy
from it, that was supplied by the Coriolis effect.
But the flywheel described here makes possible,
and even easy, the interception of this energy.
Also the flywheel does NOT require any energy
supply. Thus in fact it is a good example of
a so-called "perpetual motion" (PM) device.
On the basis of that pendulum from Frombork,
which rotated continually just by itself upon the
action of the Coriolis effect, already now we can
conclude, that the mechanical "perpetual motion"
(PM) described here must also work in practice.
After all, the action of the Coriolis effect is confirmed
on countless number of cases, not just only on the
case of that pendulum from Frombork. Unfortunately,
the PM described here is not much useful
in practice as a source of free energy, because
of its small thrust torque and highly awkward
rotational velocity that amounts to just a single
rotation per day. (The thrust torque of the
flywheel described here is relatively small, because
equal to just a momentum of inertia of it, minus the
momentum of friction on its bearings, and minus the
breaking momentum which originates from imperfections
in the balancing and in the precision of pointing
the axis of rotation.) However, in spite of its small
practical usefulness, this flywheel still is worth of
building, because of its awareness, psychological,
educational, and inspirational values.
#F3.
The significance of the mechanical perpetual motion as a breakthrough illustration
that causes a revolution in views, knowledge, and emotional attitudes of witnesses:
Of course, as every other "perpetual motion"
device, such a flywheel rotated by the action
of the Coriolis effect will have a huge value
as a technological curiosity and as an illustration
for the correctness of the idea for this kind
of devices. After all, its everlasting rotations
by 15 degrees each hour, and by 1 rotation
each day, will prove to everyone who is to
see it, that perpetual motion devices can be
build after all, and that our science to date,
as usual, also this time was at wrong when
it declared categorically that such devices
will NEVER work.
Just for this reason I personally suggested that
such a perpetually rotating flywheel is installed
in the future museum of free and renewable
energy in Wszewilki (or in Milicz). The
organising such a museum I am lobbying
inhabitants of these settlements for quite a
time. My proposals as to what generators
of free energy should be exhibited in such
a museum from Wszewilki, are described
in item #F4.1 from the update of the web page
wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm - about dreams of better future for the village of Wszewilki
dated 27 February 2008, or later.
The usefulness of the flywheel described here
as a highly educational exhibit for any possible
museum, is also increased by the fact, that this
flywheel can be build by local tradesmen for
practically every museum. Thus, with a bit of local
patriotism, such a flywheel can be completed
in there either completely free of charge as the
altruistic deed of local tradesmen, or just for
a small cost that would cover prices of materials.
#F4.
How to build the perpetually rotating flywheel described here:
The construction of the perpetually rotating
flywheel described here is relatively simple.
It suffices to recover from a junkyard an
old flywheel together with the permanent
axel to which it is attached, or retrieve any
heavy wheel (with an axel) that is well
balanced - e.g. a large railway wheel.
Then this flywheel needs to be supplied
in good bearings so that its axel is parallel
to the axis of Earth's rotation. For this,
the axis of its rotation should be positioned
exactly along the line of geographical
south-north, and also this axis should be
slanted vertically by the angle that is equal
to the geographical latitude of the place
in which this flywheel is to be assembled.
For example, for such flywheels assembled
on the territory of Poland, the angle of their
slanting towards horizontal should amount
somewhere between 49 and 55 degrees -
depending on the exact location of the
place in which someone is going to build it.
After it is assembled, the flywheel needs to
be check for its precise balancing in the
angular positioning, and for the easiness
of its rotations. If it is balanced precisely and
easily rotating, any marking made on its
circumference is going to indicate that this
flywheel in fact does rotate all by itself by
one rotation per each full day.
For a better illustration of the actual rotations of
the flywheel described here, the axel that rotates
together with it can be coupled with a multiplying
gearbox for a "flywheel pointer". The function of
such a multiplying gearbox can be performed
by a mechanism that is dismantled from an old
and unused clock. This is because mechanisms
of such old clocks frequently were constructed
for the gear ratio 1:1440 (1440 = 24x60). Thus,
when a single rotation per day is supplied at the
input to the multiplying gearbox with such a ratio,
then one rotation per minute is received at the
exit from it. This means that the "flywheel pointer"
(preferably of a large size) attached to the exit
from such a multiplying gearbox, is going to
rotate with the speed clearly noticeable to
human eyes. The rotational velocity of such
a "flywheel pointer" would be equal to the speed
with which in present watches rotates the pointer
of seconds.
Of course, the biggest challenge for the builders
of such flywheel would be to transform it into an
electricity generator. After all, in order to be able
to operate as an electricity generator, it needs
to be supplied into a gearbox which its just one
revolution per day would multiply into some
useful rotations which would be able to generate
electricity. Fortunately, this challenge is purely
theoretical, as the energy efficiency of such a
single flywheel is so small, that it is NOT worth
of effort to turn it into an energy generator. Thus
such a change into an electricity generator would
only have a value as a proof which documents
to everyone that this flywheel is in fact able
to generate free electricity - in spite that the official
human science claimed categorically that such
generation of free electricity is absolutely
impossible. But the amount of electricity that
it would generate in practice would be too
small in order to justify its practical application
for an industrial scale. However, the illustrative
proving that this flywheel generates some free
electricity after all, would have an inspiring
value. This is because it would motivate people
to seek other principles of operation for perpetual
motion devices, which would be able to generate
much higher amounts of electrical energy.
In order to enable such a perpetually rotating
flywheel to propel a small generator of electricity,
a large multiplying gearbox would need to be
coupled with the axel of it. This gearbox would
need to multiply one rotation per day of the
flywheel, into at least one rotation per second
of the rotor of the electricity generator. This
means that such a gearbox would need to
have the multiplying gear ratio of at least 1:86400.
This in turn means, that if such a multiplying
gearbox is based on mechanical principles
of operation - as this was done in old clocks,
then only its loses for friction would consume
an entire thrust torque generated by the flywheel.
Also in practice such a gearbox would typically
self-jam and thus it would be unable to
carry out the motion because of its inner
friction. In turn a possible hydraulic device
would have larger leaks than the output
from the pumping efficiency generated
by the motion of this flywheel.
To summarise, although as a useful source
of free energy, the single flywheel working in
the way described above is rather of no much
use. However, in my opinion it still has a revolutionary
significance. After all, it illustratively proves
that in fact there are principles of operation
which are able to supply perpetual motion to
people for free. Thus the flywheel constitutes
a visual proof for the correctness of the idea
of perpetual motion devices. Furthermore, it
supplies a starting device for future working out
the entire systems of such flywheels which
are to yield energy more efficiently. As such, the
single flywheel described here has immense
significance as a historical and museum
curiosity, as a teaching aid, as a source of
inspiration which is to drive further searches
for more useful principles of operation for
perpetual motion devices, and as a breakthrough
in our thinking.
#F5.
Why the perpetually rotating flywheel described here was NOT invented accidentally already a long time ago:
In order the flywheel described here works
as a perpetual motion device, its axis of
rotation must be exactly parallel
to the axis of rotation of the Earth. This
requirement, although very elementary,
in fact make impossible an accidental
invention of this flywheel. After all, practically
almost all flywheels which people constructed
so-far, have their axes of rotation positioned
horizontally. So in spite that people built many
of such flywheels already in the first stage of
implementation of steam and combustion
engines, in fact almost none of them worked
in the positioning that would convert it into a
perpetual motion device. After all, in order
any of these flywheels with a horizontal axis
of rotation worked as a perpetual motion
device, it would need to be located exactly
on the equator of the Earth, and its axis of
rotation would need to be pointed exactly
along the line south-north. However, along
the Earth's equator almost NO civilisation
centres are located in which first steam or
combustion engines with flywheels would
be placed. So users of these first engines
had NO opportunity to accidentally witness
work of such flywheels as perpetual motion
devices. Thus in fact humanity never obtained
a chance for an accidental discovery that
flywheels can work as perpetual motion devices.
#F6.
An entire system of flywheels - means how to improve the principle of the perpetually rotating single flywheel described above, to increase its energy yield:
In item #B1.2 of this web page it was explained,
that in order "perpetual motion" devices
can be transformed into generators of free
energy, one needs to form in them the "energy
feedback loop". This feedback would loop a part
of energy which they generate at the exit, feeding
this energy back into their entrance, thus "multiplying"
their entire energy yield. In a single flywheel described
before the formation of such a feedback is
impossible. But if one combines together
an entire system of such flywheels, which is to
contain several of them, then the "energy
feedback loop" can be accomplished in this
system. Let us now consider how this can be
achieved.
The momentum of inertia is a first quantity which
allows us to form easily the "energy feedback loop"
in a larger system of flywheels similar to the flywheel
described before. In turn, as we know from item
#F2 above, this momentum of inertia influences
linearly the amount of energy generated by a
given flywheel or by a given system of flywheels.
Means, the higher the momentum
of inertia, the more free energy one is able
to harvest from it. In turn the increase the
momentum of inertia can be accomplished
on two different manners. One of these manners
depends on the increase of the mass of a given
flywheel - and this is rather a clumsy manner.
After all, in order to generate a reasonable
amount of useful free energy such a flywheel
would need to be massive and weight many
tons. Another, more "elegant" manner of
the increase of its momentum of inertia
depends on the use of so-called "gyroscopic
effect". In turn this effect is to increase the
momentum of inertia of the flywheel discussed
here, if this flywheel instead of being constructed
as a single massive wheel, is rather build in
a segmented manner as a system of several
smaller flywheels which mutually increase their
rotational velocity. (We must remember that
in fact the Earth rotates in relation to these wheels,
not these wheels rotate in relation to the Earth.)
Of course, such a gyroscopic system still must
be perfectly balanced, so that it will NOT form
a gravitational momentum of resistance.
What even interesting, with such a segmental
design of the well-balanced flywheel described
here, the rotational velocity of its composite
wheels (the ones which generate the gyroscopic
effect) can be forwarded to their input through
the energy feedback loop from their output.
Thus such a systems will "multiply" by itself
the energy that it is to generate.
Another quantity which could also make it possible
to form "energy feedback loop" in the entire
system of flywheels, is the capability to intercept
the Coriolis effect during the rotations. Namely,
the behaviour of water in fast rivers suggests
that the Coriolis effect is able to act on flywheels
that already rotate. (Of course, whether in reality
this happens, it is going to be revealed by
experiments after constructing first such flywheels.)
This practically means, that several flywheels
could be coupled together into cascades
via coupling gears. In these cascades, the first
flywheel, which would be the flywheel described
before - that revolves once per day, would
propel via a coupling gear a next flywheel
that would rotate much faster, but still would
intercept the Coriolis effect, and this one in
turn would propel still another flywheel via a
coupling gear, etc., etc.
In the result, the last flywheel in this cascade,
would already have the rotational velocity
able to propel effectively an electricity generator,
while the thrust momentum of it would be equal
to the sum of thrust momentums of all flywheels
of the cascade. Thus, such a cascade would
provide the velocity feedback loop. Means
it would make possible to harvest the output
velocity from a first flywheel and feed it as an
input velocity of a next flywheel.
If the Coriolis effect allows to form such cascades
of flywheels with growing rotational velocities, then
also the nature of these coupling gears between
subsequent flywheels is to change. Namely, when
there is only a single flywheel, the gear which
feeds its rotations onto an electricity generator
would be a so-called multiplying gear.
In turn, as this is explained above in item #F4,
such multiplying gears have their upper threshold
limit of ratio for which the internal friction begins
to cause them getting jammed. Therefore, e.g. the
ratio 1:86400 would be technically very difficult
to accomplish in multiplying gears. However,
when we deal with two flywheels, each one of which
is self-propelled by the Coriolis effect, then the
coupling gear which regulates their mutual rotations
looses its character of a multiplying gear. Thus
the ratio of it can be of any large value (even
która reguluje ich wzajemne prędkości traci swój
larger than 1:86400), and the coupling gear is
still going to work without getting self-jammed.
Therefore in such a cascade of self-propelling
flywheels, the rotational velocity at the exit which
become capable of an effective propelling of
an electricity generator, probably can be
accomplish already in cascades composed
of just two or three flywheels.
To summarise these deductions, the actual building
the perpetually rotating flywheel described before
would only be a beginning, not the conclusion.
This is because such building creates opportunity
to learn attributes and behaviours of such flywheels -
as NO one researched these characteristics.
In turn this learning opens a possibility to build
entire systems of such flywheels, which systems
can be subjected to further improvements that
are to increase their energy yields. Thus the
second step after the first such flywheel is build,
is to redesign it into e.g. a gyroscopic system
and a cascade system. Such a system is to be
composed of several well-balanced flywheels,
the rotation of which would propel itself, and which
would mutually increase their momentum of inertia
and their rotational velocity (and thus also their
energy yield). What even more interesting, these increasingly
faster spinning componential flywheels could be
designed in such a manner that they would
constitute rotors of electricity generators.
In this manner it would become possible
to increase the energy yield of the "perpetual
motion" principle described here, and perhaps
even transform this principle into a principle of
technically viable generator of free energy.
Part #G:
A "car on water" - still further example of other kinds and principles of free energy generators:
#G1.
Telekinetic dissociators of water into oxygen and hydrogen to become main components of the "engines on water":
Our civilisation developed technically quite
perfect form of propelling device, which is
present combustion engine. In spite that
people are trying to replace it with other
propelling devices, all these other devices
always contain various disadvantages which
make them significantly inferior in comparison
to the combustion engine. However, a single
problem which this combustion engine has, is
the kind of fuels that it presently uses. After
all, when it burns present fossil fuels, it produces
undesirable combustion gases which pollute
the Earth's atmosphere. Furthermore, deposits
of fossil fuels are close to the exhaustion on the
Earth. But if in this engine we replace the fossil
fuels which are currently used, with a mixture
of hydrogen and air (which is equally safe as
the present mixture of petrol and air), then the
same combustion engine rapidly ceases to
has the problem. Then it works equally effectively
and reliably as at present, but simultaneously
instead of undesirable combustion gases
it emits just ordinary water vapours. Therefore,
the major challenge which our civilisation has,
is to change gradually the to-date "engine on petrol"
into the futuristic engine on water.
The major difficulty with such adoption of
combustion engines for fuel in the form of
mixture of hydrogen and the air depends
on effective production of hydrogen at the
inlets to these engines. This problem is
solved by so-called "telekinetic dissociators
of water" described, amongst others, in
subsection LA3.2 from volume 10 of
monograph [1/5].
Their principle of operation is very similar
to the operation of "telekinetic heaters"
described on the web page
boiler.htm - about the shocking history of telekinetic heater which bits all records,
while summarised here in "part #E" of this
web page. The main difference between
such telekinetic dissociators of water
and "telekinetic heaters" boils down to the
use of different frequency of vibrations
and also different catalysers (materials).
For example, the frequency of vibrations
which cause the dissociation of water into
hydrogen and oxygen must be identical
to the own resonance frequency of particles
of water. In turn the catalyser used must
spontaneously neutralise the electrical charges
of both gases to allow them exist as separate
gases. The phenomenon of telekinesis utilised
in the principle of operation of such "telekinetic
dissociators of water" allows them to accomplish
the energy efficiency that significantly exceeds
100%. In turn such high energy efficiency
causes that the telekinetic dissociation of
water uses significantly less energy to produce
hydrogen, than the energy that is generated
by the engine which burns this hydrogen.
Thus, the future "engines on water" discussed
here are going to self-supply into energy their
own dissociators of water, without requiring any
other energy nor fuel apart from just a pure
water. The development and manufacturing
of such telekinetic dissociators of water which
are to replace present carburettors from
combustion engines e.g. in our cars, is going
to lead to the situation that in the future all
combustion engines will burn exclusively
water, which these engines will decompose
just by themselves into hydrogen and oxygen.
(For safety reason only hydrogen is to be used,
while oxygen is to be let out to the air. The attempt
to burn also oxygen would introduce a fire-threat.)
In turn exhaustion gases from this burning
will be just water vapour (steam).
(I suggested that the development of production
of such telekinetic dissociators of water
to be undertaken one day in my native
village Wszewilki - see descriptions from
item #C4.5 of the web page
wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm.)
Many people believes that is it not worth to
invest into the transformation of present
combustion engines into engines that burn
a mixture of hydrogen and the air. They
believe that it is much better for our civilization
to get rid of combustion engines all together
and replace them with electric motors. Although
such complete replacement of combustion
engines may sound realistic and attractive, there
are going to be numerous situations on Earth,
when it turns out impossible. As examples consider
tradition, bobbies, or sport - although there are also
countless other reasons at work. In future it will
be impossible to forbid people who cultivate a
tradition of hobby which requires combustion
engines, or who practice a motor sport, to remove
completely combustion engines from whatever
is the essence of their tradition, hobby or sport.
After all, if for example someone wishes in the
future to enjoy for a hobby the present motorbike
"Harley-Davidson" (and I am ready to bet that
there is going to be many such people), then
it will be impossible to do so after replacing in
it the combustion engine with an electric motor.
After all, whatever would be received then would
NOT be a "Harley-Davidson" any more. But
then it is possible and feasible to replace in
this motorbike the presently used fuel by
a mixture of hydrogen and the air. In turn,
after such a replacement of the fuel, and
after the introduction of slight technical
changes which this replacement would
require, what would be obtained still would
have all attributes of the motorbike
"Harley-Davidson". Of course, this motorbike
is indicated here as an example. In the future
everything that presently uses a combustion
engine, a jet engine, or a rocket propulsion,
can be used in the same manner as today
only after a small conversion to allow in engines
use the mixture of hydrogen with the air for fuel
while in rockets use the mixture of hydrogen
with oxygen. In turn such a conversion will
require only the replacement of present
carburettors with "telekinetic dissociators
of water" described here, while for petrol
just water will be stored in their tanks.
The entire rest of their design, principles
of operation, manners of work, controllability,
engine longevity, validity of designs, theories
and research, technical improvements,
culture, human habits, etc., etc.,
will then remain without any changes.
"Engines on water", which are to generate the fuel
by themselves through the telekinetic dissociation
of water, will display a whole range of extraordinary
benefits. Also all these benefits become passed
onto machines which use these engines, for example
onto the future "cars on water". Let us list here the
most vital amongst these benefits:
(1)
These engines will be incomparably more safe
than present combustions engines which use e.g.
petrol. After all, otherwise than this in present
engines which need tanks with flammable fuel,
these "engines on water" will just have storages
of inflammable water. The flammable fuel they will
generate just a short while before it is to be burned
and only in the required (small) quantities at once.
Thus such "engines on water" will NOT be able to
ignite nor initiate a fire or an explosion of themselves
nor e.g. a whole car - as we frequently see this happening
with our present engines. Also the hydrogen-air mixture
that they are to burn is much safer than the present
mixture of the petrol with the air, because it is
difficult to ignite, while in case of leakages it is to simply
escape into the air instead of spilling over the engine.
(2)
These engines will be extremely inexpensive in exploitation.
After all their fuel is to be just an ordinary water
the huge reserves of which we have all over the Earth.
This water is going to be telekinetically dissociated
by them (with the efficiency of over 100%) into
hydrogen and oxygen by the excess of energy which
these engines will generate through the burning
of hydrogen.
(3)
These engines are NOT going to generate any air
pollution. After all, from their exhaustion pipes just
water vapour (steam) is going to escape.
(4)
All to-date accomplishments of the humanity in
the area of building combustion engines remain
valid for them. Thus everything that the humanity
knows on the subject of increasing their longevity,
perfection of work, scientific foundations, experiences
in design and building, maintenance, use, etc., is
to remain valid for them.
(5)
These engines are NOT going to outbalance the
nature. After all, their fuel is to originate from the
dissociation of water, while their products of work
simply are to restore this water. Furthermore, to
supply them into fuel, the humanity does NOT
need mines nor oil refineries.
#G2.
The present level of development of a "car on water" - means the use of hydrogen from the process of dissociation of water for increasing the efficiency of fuel burning:
For quite some time in Internet and in literature
the idea of so-called "car on water" is being
developed. This name can on water
means a modified car in which the burning
of mixture of petrol with the air is going to be
replaced gradually by the burning of the mixture
of hydrogen with oxygen obtained in the same
car with the use of process of telekinetic
dissociation of pure water into hydrogen
and oxygen. Thus in such a "car on water",
a pure water is to be used for a fuel, while
from the exhaustion pipe of it the water vapour
(steam) is going to escape. Of course, as
everything in this physical world, such a
"car on water" is constructed gradually. In
this item I am going to describe the present
level of its development, in the state on 13
June 2008, when in New Zealand television
was shown a model of this car build by two
young hobbyists from New Zealand.
On Friday, 13 June 2008 at 7:00 pm to 7:30 pm
on channel 3 of the New Zealand television, in
a programme called "Campbell Live", a report
(news item) was broadcasted about two young
hobbyists from New Zealand, who constructed
for themselves the present version of the "car
on water". These two hobbyists simply modified
an old model of the car that they had (probably
it was "Ford Falcon"), so that they implemented in it
the present level of technology of the "car on water".
I personally was NOT interested in this programme
in the technology that they used, as this technology
is described in Internet and in literature already
for many years, but in savings of fuel burned
that were measured in their modification. Namely,
in the television programme discussed here fuel
consumptions were compared for two identical cars
of the same model and the same age (and even
the same colour). One amongst these two cars
was just that "car on water" modified by these two
hobbyists. In turn the other one was an almost
identical to it car of the same model and year
of production, but NOT modified (i.e. just in the original factory design).
In both these cars simultaneously the television
crews drove along 100 kilometres road with exactly
the same speeds, then they measured the fuel
consumptions in both of them. It turned out that
the "car on water" of these young hobbyists burned
only around 5 litres of petrol. In turn the non-modified
car burned over 20 litres of petrol. This in turn means
that small modifications that are required for constructing
the present technology of "cars on water" in this particular
case decreased the fuel consumption to only 25% (one
fourth, or a quarter) of the original fuel consumption.
It is easy to work out that the saving on fuel
in the car which was modified by these young
hobbyists could be non-typically high. After all,
these hobbyists modified one amongst American
"gas-guzzlers". These in turn are widely known
in the world from a wasteful burning of fuel.
So if someone modifies in the same manner
a present efficient car of e.g. Japanese or Korean
production, then probably will NOT get such
spectacular results.
On the other hand, the dissociator of water used
by these hobbyists worked on conventional principle.
So if in stead of this conventional principle, the
telekinetic dissociator of water is used with the
energy efficiency of over 100% (as described
in item #G1 above), then the savings on fuel
should be high for practically every car. Also,
as the principles of operation of such telekinetic
dissociators of water are going to be improved,
in such cars probably the complete elimination
of burning the fuel other than water can be
gradually accomplished.
In this television programme explained was also
the modification of the car that was utilised by these
young hobbyists. It turned out that this modification
was very simple and based on present technology
of dissociation of water into hydrogen and oxygen.
It boiled down to adding a small dissociator of water
to a typical car engine that burns petrol (i.e. non-modified engine).
This dissociator of water consumed the electricity
that was generated by the car's dynamo to
dissociate water into hydrogen and oxygen.
Then hydrogen was mixed with the air that was
supplied to the carburettor of that car. Thus, instead
of burning only the mixture of petrol and air, this
particular car burned the mixture of petrol, air,
and the hydrogen gas. In the result of burning
such a mixture, the temperature of burning in
the car's cylinder was increased significantly.
In addition, the hydrogen-air flame which this
mixture formed in the cylinder, performed a function
of a dynamic "catalyser" which improved the
dynamics of the burning of mixture of fuel and
the air. In turn, this increase of the temperature
during burning the mixture of petrol-air-hydrogen,
together with the catalysing ability of the hydrogen
flame (a) increased many folds the efficiency of
burning the fuel, (b) enhanced the performance
of the engine, and (c) it additionally eliminated the
smoke from fumes almost completely. Thus, this
car burned petrol so effectively, that instead of
smoke that typically escapes from the exhaustion
pipes in normal cars, in this car from the exhaustion
pipe escaped only transparent carbon dioxide
and equally transparent water vapour (steam).
So in spite that in this car the dissociation of water
was carried out in a classical manner (i.e. without
the use of telekinesis) and at the cost of burning petrol,
still the hydrogen produced as the outcome of this
dissociation, so effectively increased the temperature
and efficiency of fuel burning, that it decreased the
fuel consumption by almost 75%. This car consumed
also around 1 litre of water per 100 kilometres.
The only improvement that these two hobbyists added
to the already described in internet technology of
constructing such "cars on water", was a special
breaker system (safety vent) which prevented the ignition
of hydrogen in cases if the car "sneezed to its carburettor".
Unfortunately, this particular prototype of the "car
on water" was shown in television. Thus many
details that are worth to learn were NOT provided
in there. Also in spite that the channel 3 of the
New Zealand television has two web pages, i.e.
www.tv3.co.nz and
www.3news.co.nz,
on none of these I could find anything about this
"car on water", or about its hobby constructors.
However, I will seek further data either
about these young hobbyists and their
modification, or about other prototypes of "cars
on water". In turn when I find something
worth reporting here (e.g. further descriptions
of such modifications of a specific car, the
specifications of which I can verify in person
as true ones, or contact details to real people
who implemented such modifications), I am
going to describe it here.
The television programme reported above was
one of these rare exceptions, when instead of
just showing problems, for change the television
provided an example of solution to a problem.
For this reason the programme got a huge response
amongst hobbyists of New Zealand. In the result
many people who had conditions for "doing it yourself",
implemented in their own cars the solution of the
"car on water" shown in this program. Therefore
on Monday, 23 June 2008, at 7:00 to 7:10 pm
on the same channel TV3, a follow up continuation
of this tv programme was broadcasted. Amongst others,
another New Zealand hobbyist demonstrated in it
his own construction of a "dissociator of water" which
he used in his "car on water". His dissociator was
extremely simple. It did NOT separate hydrogen
from oxygen, nor it vented the oxygen into the air.
(Such a separation and venting typically is done
in "cars on water" for safety reasons - to prevent
a self-ignition and fire.) It supplied to the carburettor
both these gases mixed together. Because this
mixture of gases threats to self-ignite, in order
to eliminate the danger of a fire he was using
additional "water vent". This hobbyist claimed
that the construction of the entire installation of
his "car on water" cost him only around 50
dollars. His "dissociator of water" was made of
a 1 litre glass jar into which he poured a litre of
water with the addition of a table spoon of "baking
soda" (this baking soda is to intensify the process
of dissociation of water). In the water of this jar two
electrodes connected to the battery were submerged.
After starting the engine these electrodes dissociated
water into a gaseous mixture of hydrogen and
oxygen. The mixture gathered at the top of the
jar, from where it was supplied by a plastic pipe
to the "water vent", and then to the inlet of cylinders.
His "water vent" was also very simple. It was a small
bottle left from cream, full of water, in which the gaseous
mixture needed to bubble through the water. So in
case of an accidental ignition of the mixture of hydrogen
and oxygen, the flame would be cut off on this water.
The hobbyist claimed that just such a "water vent"
suffices for the prevention of a fire, as his installation
generates only as much of the flammable mixture
as was immediately used up.
The main reason why it is worth to advance
technologies of "cars on water", is that the gradual
mastery of the telekinetic dissociation of water
which gives the efficiency of over 100% (described
in item #G1 above) one day will allow to accomplish
a breakthrough. Namely it will allow to eliminate
completely the fuel burning in cars in the future.
It is going to gradually turn cars into kinds of
self-propelling generators of free energy which
burn exclusively pure water that they dissociate
telekinetically themselves into hydrogen and
oxygen. Therefore the version of the "car on
water" described here is the first step towards
such a breakthrough. The second step will come
when the conventional dissociator of water will
become replaced by the telekinetic dissociator
of above 100% efficiency. This telekinetic dissociator
will supply additionally the cylinder into the mixture
of hydrogen with the air, similarly as this is done in
the car on water described here. In turn the third,
final step towards the breakthrough will be when
the burning of petrol will be completely eliminated
and replaced with the burning of just the mixture
of the air and hydrogen. Coincidently, during writing
this paragraph the Japanese Honda come to the
market with the new car the engine of which burns
exclusively the mixture of the air and hydrogen
(only that the hydrogen is NOT generated in the
car as it is needed, but accumulated in the tank
instead of the fuel - thus unfortunately increasing
the threat of starting a fire and explosion).
The description of this Japanese car is in the
article "Zero emission car in production"
from page C5 of the New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Wednesday, June 18, 2008.
In order to build a car that is in 100% fuelled
by water, an effort of a large research and
development team is necessary, nut just
skills of a single scientist. However, in order
such a team could be formed and accomplishing
a success, the goal for its action is needed,
and also a general direction of the path which
is to lead to accomplishing this goal. These
in turn are explained on the separate web page
eco_cars.htm - about the design and principles of operation of zero emission cars of the future.
That other web page NOT only describes the
present state of technology of "cars on water",
including guidelines as how to "do it yourself"
when you convert your own "gas-guzzler"
into a "car on water" described above in
item #G2. That other web page describes also several
other feasible and already proven correct
designs and principles of operation for highly
economical zero emission cars of our future.
That other web page even describes the accumulator
of energy for cars (i.e. a car battery), for the invention
of which Senator McCain promises the award
of 300 millions of USA dollars.
Part #H:
The "curse of inventors" - means a secretive persecutions of inventors, scientists,
and all other creative people who further the "real progress" of humanity:
#H1.
Where from comes this mysterious persecution of inventors and researchers of free energy generators:
When analysing biographies of inventors
it is not difficult to notice a strange trend.
Namely, whenever a new device is invented
and build on the Earth, and it introduces
a "real progress" to the humanity - as such
a "real progress" is defined in item #G4 of
the web page named
eco_cars.htm,
then immediately a sort of
"curse of inventors"
is unleashed. This curse soon squashes
either the device or the inventor. Only on
this web page three immensely important
inventions are described, i.e. three devices
of "free energy", all of which were suppressed
by this "curse of inventors". Further similar
cases are described in item #G2 of the totaliztic web page
eco_cars.htm - about pollution-free cars,
in item #H1 of the totaliztic web page
newzealand_visit.htm - about mysteries and curiosities of Antipodes,
in item #K3 of the web page
fe_cell.htm - about telekinetic cells,
in items #D1 and #F1 of the web page
boiler.htm - about the shocking fate of telekinetic heater which bits all records,
in item #B4.4 and on the entire rest of the web page
mozajski_uk.htm - about Aleksander Możajski, the Polish inventor and builder of the first flying airplane in the world,
as well as in subsection W4 from volume 18 of
monograph [1/5].
Other similar cases are described practically in every
book which presents the biography of any inventor
who developed something that fulfils that definition
of a "real progress" - explained in item #G4 from
the web page named
eco_cars.htm.
The action of this "curse of inventors" squashing
inventions is a rule - no matter in which country
a given invention is accomplished. It works in
practically every country and every nation. Only
that the force with which it persecutes a given
inventor depends on the level of escalation of
immorality amongst inhabitants of that nation
and country. This is why in some countries with
especially high escalation of immorality, inventors are
unable to introduce into life even a single invention
that furthers the "real progress" - as such "real
progress" is defined in item #G4 from the web page
eco_cars.htm.
Therefore, these most immoral countries and
nations suffer the "inventive impotency" described,
amongst others, in item #B7 of the web page
seismograph.htm.
This "cures of inventors" causes also, that an inventor
of practically every invention which fulfils the definition
of the "real progress", is with some force persistently
persecuted, abused, punished, cheated, make poor,
etc., by his own countrymen. Also, almost every
such inventor dies in obscurity forgotten by everyone -
sometimes in spite that on his invention other people
make millions. These persecutions of true "progress
makers" are so common and so "unjust", that I call
these persecutions the
curse of inventors.
My explanation why this "curse of inventors" acts so
destructively and with such an "iron hand", is described
in web pages indicated before, e.g. in item #B4.4 from
the web page named
mozajski_uk.htm,
in item #G3 from the web page
eco_cars.htm, etc.
In order to summarise in just a few words reasons
described in there for the existence and for the
operation of this curse, then these would read:
the "curse of inventors" is actually a kind of
"moral mechanism" which prevents the most
immoral communities and nations from drawing
benefits out of new inventions and discoveries,
and thus which makes sure that immoral communities
and nations are "punished" due to the induction
in them the so-called "inventive impotency".
Expressing this in other words, the "cures of
inventors" is a kind of "moral mechanism" which
makes sure that new breakthrough inventions
and discoveries are implemented only by the
communities and nations which deserved the
"reward" of gaining these because they behaved
in a much more moral manner than all other
communities and nations on the Earth.
Many people do NOT believe in the existence and
action of this "curse of inventors". They ignore it
in spite that there are too many cases like this,
taking place in too many countries, to be just a
coincident. The reason for this rejection and
ignoring probably is that the work of this curse
cannot be explained without acknowledging the
fact that on the Earth must exist and act some
"supernatural power which organises this curse
and which executes every case of its work.
But even if one does not share my views, still
just by just looking at the sheer volume of inventions
that are strangely being hold back, suppressed,
or destroyed, one must admit that something really
weird is going on, and that something or someone
is intentionally suppressing the development of
"progress carrying devices (e.g. free energy
devices) on the Earth.
#H2.
The fate of nations and the entire humanity follows the way we treat creative
inventors and discoverers (NOT e.g. how we treat artists or movie stars):
Motto: "What we punish and scoff we will have increasingly less, what we reward and prise we will have increasingly more."
(Ironically, our civilisation punishes and scoffs e.g. creation of inventions and new technical ideas, while it rewards and prises e.g. public manifestations of idleness and immoral behaviour.)
Unfortunately, opposite to whatever we are
being told in schools, actually the real fate
of humanity does NOT depend on artists,
means on musicians, singers, actors,
movie stars, painters, writers, etc. God
is well aware of this fact, because He
does NOT trouble artists with the so-called
"curse of inventors" described
below in item #H4. God also does NOT
require from creative artists to be
"pedantically moral" before He allows
them to create anything new (as God
requires a pedantic morality from creative
discoverers and inventors), He does NOT
impose any requirements onto the environment
and upbringing of artists (as He does
it with discoverers and inventors - see
item #F3 on the web page named
wszewilki_uk.htm),
etc., etc. In reality, if the humanity
never has e.g. Hemingway or Picasso,
its fate still would remain as it is now.
Whatever we have and accomplished as
a civilisation and a country, we actually own
this to our inventors. Also whatever we have
in our homes and at work, that makes our
lives comfortable, easy, and civilised, we
also own this to them. Furthermore, there
seems to be a unique
moral law
operating in the universe with the iron hand,
which promotes inventions by rewarding
countries which facilitate their technical
development, and simultaneously punishing
countries which oppress their inventors.
This moral law causes, that the fate
of all citizens of a given nation always
follows the way these citizens treat their
inventors. For this reason, each
invention that is squashed or hold back,
is actually disadvantaging every single
one of us, as well as our children,
grandchildren, etc.
Creative inventors can be compared to geese
that lie golden eggs. The logic tells us, that if
someone has a goose that lies golden eggs,
such someone should nourish it, take a good
care of it, encourage it to lie more eggs, and
help it in the difficult burden of actual laying
these eggs. However, the reality seems to be,
that usually such someone chases this goose
with a big stick. When, in spite of constantly
being chased, the goose still manages to lie
a golden egg, frequently it is being cooked
in punishment for it.
#H3.
Present people are embarrassed by their ancestors
whose immorality, prejudice and backwardness
held back progress, but simultaneously the same
people treat present inventors in the exact manner
their ancestors did:
Personally I am fascinated by the manner
on which present people try to compensate
mistakes and behaviours of their ancestors
who reinforced backwardness and ignorance
through persecuting inventors that could
bring progress. Simultaneously the same
people repeat towards present inventors
exactly the same mistakes which their ancestors
did. An excellent symbol of just such mistakes
is the monument erected for someone named
Richard Pearse - described on the web page
mozajski_uk.htm
(i.e. the one who was NOT allowed by his countrymen
to build an airplane). This is because countrymen
of the people who build this monument now obstruct
the implementation of e.g. the invention that
is described on the web page
boiler.htm.
For this reason I have an appeal to the reader.
Namely, in your own behaviour please do NOT
repeat the stand towards new inventions which
would be similar to the one displayed by such
people. Rather already now accept and implement
in practice the principle of totalizm which states
that "whatever can be conceived, it can also be achieved"
(we only need to find a way how to accomplish it).
It is a proof of the complete lack of imagination to
persecute someone only because he or she tries
to complete something that extends beyond our
knowledge and our capability to understand.
#H4.
Knowledge of the operation of the "curse of inventors" also has its advantages:
Motto: "Everything that we know above the knowledge of other people gives to us the 'competitive advantage'."
Many people do NOT wish to know about
such "truths" as for example the action of
the "curse of inventors" - described
here, or the information that "bones of
dinosaurs were intentionally 'fabricated' by
God
to make humans seek further knowledge" -
described in item #C1 of the web page named
prawda_uk.htm.
On the other hand, "every knowledge that
one has above whatever other people typically
know, is a source of the advantage over
these other people" - and thus it can be turned
into a source of someone's benefits. No
wonder that in the English culture the
meaningful question "what do you know
that we do NOT know" is frequently asked
in every situation when someone accomplished
outcomes that surprise others. Therefore,
also the knowledge about the existence and
the action of the "curse of inventors" can
be for us a source of various benefits.
An example of one amongst such benefits is the
"disappearance of disappointment". For example,
before I learned myself the fact that the "curse
of inventors" is a kind of "punishment served by
immoral nations and countries to themselves",
I was very disappointed by both, my countrymen
from Poland and by my hosts from New Zealand,
that they stubbornly do NOT allow me to complete
even a single amongst my numerous inventions.
But now this disappointment ceased to exist.
Now I know that in that way both these nations
and countries are serving the "punishment" to
themselves for their behaviours. Now I can only
be sorry for them about consequences of the
"inventive impotency" that they bring at
themselves with such their behaviours.
Another example of benefits that result from the
knowledge of the "curse of inventors" is the outcome
of "reversal" of the knowledge about the work and
force of this curese. Namely, since "the 'curse of inventors'
acts with the force that is proportional to the significance
that a given invention is to have for the nation and
for the country that is to implement this invention",
this practically means that "inventions the implementation
of which is blocked with the powerful action of the 'curse of inventors'
are to turn out to be immensely vital fo the progress
of humanity". In turn this fact reveals to us which
inventions are the most vital because on them concentrates
the highest force of the action of the "curse of inventors".
Therefore, this also reveals to me which inventions
are worth promotion with the highest devotion. And
so, due to this principle I already known that from
my own inventions the most vital are to turn out in
the future the
Oscillatory Chamber,
Magnocraft,
Time Vehicle, and
Telekinetic Cell.
After all, these are my inventions on which concentrates
the most destructive force of the "curse of inventors" to
make me abandon their development and dissemination.
This is why with such a devotion I am putting huge
amount of my effort and labour into their promotion
amongst other people. In turn out of "inventions" of
other people the most vital are to turn out one day
Telepathic Pyramid,
Zhand Heng Seismograph,
Telekinetic Influenzmaschine, and
Davey's Sonic Boiler.
Therefore, although with these "inventions" God blessed
other people, still I myself consider to be my duty towards
the humanity to put into their promotion as much of my
own energy and labour as only it is possible in my
circumstances. After all, I am aware that one day
these inventions are to turn immensely vital for the
advancement of entire human civilisation.
Notice, that because of the significance to our
civilisation, the "curse of inventors" and also
the so-called "inventive impotency"
which stems from this curse, are described
on a number of totaliztic web pages, for example
in item #G1 from the web page named
eco_cars.htm,
in item #M3 from the web page named
fe_cell.htm,
in item #D1 from the web page named
boiler.htm,
and in several further totaliztic publications.
Part #I:
The progress in generation of free energy requires the understanding of phenomena
of telekinesis that are described by the "theory of everything" called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity:
#I1.
To understand free energy we need to learn about the phenomenon of telekinesis:
In order to be successful in constructing
free energy devices, we firstly need to learn how they work and what
principles they involve. Because all free energy devices
work on principles of telekinetic motion, thus in order for us to
understand how these devices work, we firstly need to learn more
about telekinesis.
Principles of telekinetic motion are described
comprehensively in chapter H from volume 4 of
monograph [1/5].
They are also summarised on several web pages, for example on
telekinesis.htm.
But in case these resources are unavailable at this moment, I am
going to repeat here the most vital details on the telekinetic motion.
#I2.
How telekinesis works:
Imagine that you are able to move a reflection of any object in a mirror,
without moving the mirror and without moving this object. Then, most
probably, the motion of this reflection would cause that the original
object would also be forced to move. Especially if light would behave
like gravity forces. The new scientific theory called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity states, that our physical world
is only the first of two parallel physical worlds that exist in our universe.
This is because on the other end of gravity dipole, there is also another physical
world called the counter-world. Both these worlds, means "our world"
and the "counter-world", relate to each other just like objects and their
mirror reflections. This also means that every known object exists in
two physical copies, each one of which stays in a separate world. (Religions
call these two copies with names "body" and "spirit" or "soul".) Both copies of the
same object are tightly linked together with forces of gravity. Therefore,
if one copy is moved, another copy must follow. If we are able to move
the copy (spirit) which resides in this other world, then the motion of
this copy is going to force the physical object to also move. Such motion
that is initiated in this other world is called "telekinesis".
There is a wealth of empirical evidence
which confirms that the counter-world definitely exists. For example,
the existence of it can easily be proven through the behaviour of gravity
force lines. Namely, the gravity field displays a dynamic dipolar character,
similar to that of magnetic field, i.e. it has two poles (inlet "I" and
outlet "O"). But in spite of this dipolar character, we see in our world
only the first (inlet "I") pole of gravity field. This practically means,
that the second pole of the dynamic dipolar gravity field must disappear
from our world and emerge in this another, parallel world. Unfortunately,
because in normal state all our senses remain in the physical world, we
do not see what happens in this other parallel counter-world. (Our senses
visit the counter-world only during hypnosis and during dream.) It is a
bit like with people
swimming in a sea - because their eyes remain above the water level, they
do not see that below the surface there is an entire underworld. But the
counter-world is described by almost all religions - it is that one in
which our spirit and soul resides. Furthermore, the so-called Kirlian photography
allows to see objects that exist in the counter-world, but do not exist
in our world. Most clear images provided by this counter-world are revealed
during the so-called "ghost-leaf experiment" with a Kirlian camera. In this
experiment a part of the leaf is removed, while the incomplete leaf is
placed on the camera. But the camera shows a complete leaf. In a similar
way a Kirlian camera shows images of amputated fingers - copies of which
are still present in the counter-world. (More on the "ghost-leaf effect"
is explained in
treatise [7/2].)
The existence of the
counter-world was also proven formally
by the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
through the investigation of behaviours
of gravity field - for wording of this formal
scientific proof for the existence of counter-world
see item #D3 from the web pager named
dipolar_gravity.htm.
(The relatively new scientific theory called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
has determined, that gravity is a dipolar field,
similar to magnetic fields. Thus, the second
pole of the gravity field must go somewhere,
since it does not appear in our world - means
that it goes into this other world.) For more
details on this formal proof see in subsection
H1.1.4 from volume 4 of my newest
monograph [1/5]
entitled "Advanced Magnetic Devices", or
subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4 of my older
monograph [8/2]
entitled Totalizm -
both downloadable for free via this web site.
Also there is a wealth of empirical evidence
available to interested researchers, like the
"extraction glow" shown in "Fig. I1" from this
web page (or H1 from [1/5]), which proves
the existence of the counter world and also
proves the real character of all phenomena
which are triggered by this counter-world
(like the phenomenon of "telekinetic motion").
An extremely interesting fact that this new
"Concept of Dipolar Gravity" established about
the counter-world, is that practically every
material object which exists in our world, have
a duplicate in it (religions call this duplicate
a "spirit" or a "soul", although they get lost
in explaining what is the difference between
these two). To be more interesting, this duplicate
can be moved with the use of capabilities of
the counter-world. But when this duplicate is
moved, the physical object must follow it (means
when we move a "spirit" or a "soul", a "body"
must follow it). This extraordinary type of motion,
which is accomplished through moving firstly
"spirits" of physical objects, is called a "telekinetic
motion". It is possible to build technical devices
which are to produce such a motion. Several
such devices are described in volumes 9 to
15 of my newest
monograph [1/5],
and also here on this web page. The most
interesting one amongst these devices is a
space vehicle called
magnocraft,
which utilises "telekinetic motion" for instant
flights to distant star systems. There is
a separate web site about this space vehicle.
This site is named
propulsion.htm - about advanced magnetic propulsion systems.
Please have a look at it.
#I3.
Mechanism of Telekinesis:
In subsection H6.1 of
monograph [1/5]
there is a description of telekinetic motion,
which illustratively explains how to understand
this phenomenon in the light of the "Concept
of Dipolar Gravity". I am quoting below this
description because it quite well illustrates
the mechanism that telekinetic motion implements.
Here is this quotation:
The Concept of Dipolar Gravity postulates,
that the universe must be composed of two parallel physical worlds (i.e. our world,
and the counter-world), the attributes of which are to each other as attributes of
spaces that prevail at opposite poles of magnetic dipoles. These two worlds are
separated from each other by impenetrable barrier, while to each one of them an
opposite pole of gravity extends. Because of the nature of gravity, which requires
that this field must always link some clusters of substances, all gravity dipoles
are behaving as kinds of "marriage bounds", which link with each other into
symmetrical pairs, all similar particles of substances that prevail on both ends
of a given gravity dipole (i.e. in both worlds). In the result, for every object
that exist in one of these two worlds, the gravity field forms an identical
duplicate that appears in the second of these two worlds. Thus one of the major
discoveries of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, is the postulate, that all
material objects that exist in our set of dimensions (i.e. in our world) must
have their counter-material duplicates that exist in the parallel set of dimensions
(i.e. in the counter-world). Actually the existence of these counter-material
duplicates can already be conclusively proven with our present technology by
showing it with the use of Kirlian cameras. The best experiment which proves
the existence of counter-material duplicates is the "leaf ghost effect" described
by Daniela Giordano in subsection C9 of treatise [7/2]. (In this effect the
Kirlian camera shows the shape of a counter-material duplicate of a whole leaf,
even if someone cuts this leaf in half and puts on the camera only a half of it.)
The mutual relationship between each material object and its counter-material
duplicate is an analogy to an image and its mirror reflection, or to computer
hardware and software, or to the idea of 'body' and 'spirit' postulated by various
religions. Similarly like an image and its mirror reflection, both parts of an
object are exact copies of their opposite duplicate, and also exactly imitate
each other's movements. Moreover, both - the material object and its counter-material
duplicate - can also be independently taken hold of and dislocated in space. But
because of the gravitational links between them, independently of which part is
grabbed and dislocated first, the other part must imitate exactly its motion. For
this reason, depending on which part of an object is grabbed first and thus first
dislocated in space, the new Concept of Dipolar Gravity distinguishes between two
different types of motion, i.e. the "physical motion" and the "telekinetic motion".
Physical motion occurs when the material part of an object is moved first,
whereas the counter-material duplicate is pulled behind it by forces of the
gravitational links. In turn telekinetic motion occurs when the counter-material
duplicate is moved first, whereas the material part of this object is pulled
behind the counter-material duplicate by forces of their mutual gravitational
links. To illustrate this with an example, the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
shows that the telekinetic motion is like forcing an object to move by shifting
its reflection in a mirror, so that this re-located reflection causes the object
to move also. Of course in order for this example to work in reality, light would
need to behave like gravity forces. The other, even more illustrative explanation
for the telekinetic motion would be to liken it to "shifting material objects by
dislocating their counter-material 'spirits'".
This is the end of quotation from chapter H of monograph
monograph [1/5]
(and also from chapter L of monograph [8]).
Although this quotation explains the essence of telekinetic motion,
there is still a lot to this phenomenon, which because of
the sparse volume of this web page, I am not even attempting to explain here. Therefore
I recommend to download to your computer copies of volumes 4 and 5 from the
English version of
monograph [1/5]
(after all, this monograph is available here for free),
and then read at your leisure chapters H and I of that
monograph [1/5].
You should be able to find in these two chapters (H and
I) explanations for all phenomena that ever puzzled you.
Fig. #I1:The above photograph captured an unique
ghostly white glow called the "extraction glow". In
past just such a glow was considered to be "supernatural".
On this photograph it is emitted from the space
that surrounds a divining rod moved on principles
of telekinesis. It is from this space that the Telekinetic
Effect absorbed rapidly all heat, thus forcing atoms
of the air to emit a white glow. Such a ghostly white extraction
glow, together with a drop in the environmental
temperature, are two most important indicators
of telekinetic motion. They allow to distinguish
between a telekinetic motion and a physical motion.
(The above photograph originally is presented
in monograph
monograph [1/5],
where appears as Figure H1.
Also Figure L1 from
monograph [8],
Figure D5 from
monograph [1e],
and Figure C1 from
monograph [2e].
All these monographs are downloadable free
of charge via this web site.)
In old days such a ghostly white glow was considered to be "supernatural" because it
was formed by strange devices and strange creatures that people in old days
considered to belong to the realm of "devils", "angels", or "gods". Presently we know
that this type of white, ghostly light is produced by extraterrestrial vehicles
popularly known as UFOs, that are propelled on principles of telekinetic motion.
Descriptions and technical details of UFOs you can find in chapters P to U of
monograph [1/5]
and also on the web site
ufo.htm - about UFOnauts.
Part #J:
Summary, and the final information of this web page:
#J1.
Summary of this web page:
This web page reveals, that in spite
of obstacles and persecutions such
as the curse of inventors
described above in item #H1 (as well
as e.g. in item #G1 of the web page named
eco_cars.htm
and on several other web pages indicated
above) - which curse tries to suppress the
completion of "generators of free energy"
described here, such generators still slowly
eventuate to become a reality. Already
numerous working prototypes of these
devices do exist. Furthermore, new ideas
and better principles of free energy are
gradually developed by devoted
hobbyists-inventors. Thus, as this
is clearly visible, evil powers are
unable to block completely the progress
of this new technology on the Earth,
although have noticeable successes
in holding back this technology. So
there is still a hope for a better future
for the human race.
Fig. #J1: Dr Jan Pajak
,
means myself, shown on the background of pristine New Zealand
landscape. Until the most recent redundancy from the job, I lectured
computer science in a New Zealand polytechnic. I specialised in Web
Technologies and in Information Processing using Web Technologies.
Before that I worked at two universities as Associate Professor of
Mechanical Engineering. From old times I have also quite a good
knowledge of engineering, sciences, and mathematics, towards
which my education and a significant proportion of professional
experience was oriented. However, my so-called "hobby" research,
carried out continually since 1972, amongst others, is aimed at
the development of new ideas and new directions for technologies
and human outlooks of the future, including new futuristic
propulsion systems, new energy generation and storing devices,
new communication devices, new systems for remote detection of
impending earthquakes, new advanced earthquake warning systems,
and many more. Unfortunately, this research is my "hobby" not
by the own choice, but by necessity, or by "must". This is because
my over 30 years long searches for a research institution
which would accept my continually open offer of official
researching these topics, so-far are unsuccessful (i.e. it well
may be that at the moment there is no such institution on our
planet - if by any chance you accidentally find or create one,
please make sure to let me know). Also the name "hobby"
completely does not fit to the subject area of this research.
After all, it implies the orientation mainly towards gaining various
personal benefits. However, what kind of personal benefits one
may accomplish through building a starship, an accumulator of
energy of a huge capacitance, or an alarming device that
warns of an impending earthquake. Because, as so-far, an
institution on Earth does not exist that would be interested in
sponsoring this research, to earn somehow for the financing
of this research (and also for my own living), until the time
when I lost my most recent job on 23 September 2005, I used
to do a basic lecturing and research in any area for which I
was hired to work. In turn funds that I managed to earn, and
almost the entire spare time I have in my disposal, I devoted
to this "hobby" research on technologies and philosophies
of the future. (Since the time I become unemployed, I have
even more of free time which I can designate for this "hobby"
research. Unfortunately, now the financing begins to be a
serious problem. This is because according to the New
Zealand law I am not eligible for any unemployment benefit.)
For more details about the course of my life and fate, see the web page
about me
listed in the "Menu 4".
Current email addresses to the author of
this web page, i.e. officially to
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
while courteously to Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak,
at which readers can post possible comments,
opinions, descriptions, or information which in
their opinion I should learn, are provided on the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm
(for its version in the HTML language), or the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.pdf
(for the version of the web page "pajak_jan_uk.pdf"
in safe PDF format - which safe PDF versions
of further web pages by the author can also be
downloaded via links from item #B1 of the web page named
text_11.htm).
The author's right for the use of courteous
title of "Professor" stems from the custom that
"with professors is like with generals", namely
when someone is
once a professor, than he or she courteously
remains a professor forever. In
turn the author of this web page was a professor
at 4 different universities, i.e. at 3 of them,
from 1 September 1992 untill 31 October 1998,
as an "Associate Professor" from English-based
educational system, while on one university as
a (Full) "Professor" (since 1 March 2007 till
31 December 2007 - means at the last place
of employment in his professional life).
However, please notice that because of my
rather chronic lack of time, I reluctantly
reply to emails which contain JUST time
consuming requests, while simultaneously
they document a complete ignorance of their
author in the topic area which I am researching.
#J4.
How with the web page named
"skorowidz_links.htm"
one can find totaliztic descriptions
of topics in which he is interested:
A whole array of topics equally interesting
as these from the above web page, is also
discussed from the angle that is unique to
the philosophy of totalizm. All these related
topics can be found and identified with the use of
content index
prepared especially to make easier finding
these web pages and topics. The name "index"
means a list of "key words" usually provided
at the end of textbooks, which allows to find
fast the description or the topic in which we
are interested. My web pages also has such
a content "index" - only that it is additionally
supplied in green
links
which after "clicking" at them with a mouse
immediately open the web page with the topic
that interest the reader. This content "index"
is provided on the web page named
skorowidz_links.htm.
It can be called from the "organising" part of
"Menu 1" of every totaliztic web page. I would
recommend to look at it and to begin using it
systematically - after all it brings closer hundreds
of totaliztic topics which can be of interest to
everyone.
This web page is also available in the form
of a brochure marked [11], which
is prepared in "PDF" ("Portable Document
Format") - currently considered to be the
most safe amongst all internet formats, as
normally viruses cannot cling to PDF. This
clear brochure is ready both, for printing,
as well as for reading from a computer
screen. It also has all its
green links
still active. Thus, if it is read from the computer
screen connected to internet, then after clicking
onto these green links, the linked web pages
and illustrations will open. Unfortunately, because
the volume of it is around a double of the volume
of web page which this brochure publishes,
the memory limitations on a significant number
of free servers which I use, do NOT allow to
offer it from them (so if it does NOT download
from this address, because it is NOT available
on this server, then you should click onto any
other address from
Menu 3,
and then check whether in there it is available).
In order to open this brochure (and/or download
it to own computer), it suffices to either click on
the following green link
or to open from any totaliztic web site the
PDF file named as in the above green link.
If the reader wishes to check, whether some other
totaliztic web page which he or she just is studying,
is also available in the form of such PDF brochure,
then should check whether it is listed amongst links
from "part #B" of the web page named
text_11.htm.
This is because links from there indicate all totaliztic
web pages, which are already published as such
brochures from series [11] in PDF format.
I wish you a fruitful reading!
Jeśli wolisz czytać po polsku,
kliknij na polską flagę (if you prefer to read in Polish
click on the Polish flag)
Date of starting this web page: 25 May 2003
Date of the most recent update of this page: 7 October 2013
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
![Fig. #B1: Thesta-Distatica (i.e. Fig. LA4 from [1/5]).](/cgi-bin/i/14/14_k04_2.jpg)
![Fig. #C1: Telepathic pyramid (Fig. K1(high) from [1/5]).](/cgi-bin/i/14/14_n01h.jpg)
![Fig. #C2: Components of the Telepathic Pyramid (Fig. K1(low) from [1/5]).](/cgi-bin/i/14/14_n01l.jpg)
![Fig. #C3: Design of the Telepathic Pyramid (Fig. K2 from [1/5]).](/cgi-bin/i/14/14_n02.gif)
![Fig. #C4: Electrical diagram of the Telepathic Pyramid (Fig. K3 from [1/5]).](/cgi-bin/i/14/14_n03.gif)
![Fig. #D1: The appearance of telekinetic influenzmaschine (Fig. LA4 in [1/5]).](14/14_k04.jpg)
![Fig. #D2: Components of the influenzmaschine (Fig. LA5 from [1/5]).](14/14_k05b.gif)
![Fig. #D3: Electrical wiring of the influenzmaschine (Fig. LA6 from [1/5]).](14/14_k06.gif)
![Fig. #E1: The telekinetic heater of Mr Davey (Fig. LA8 from [1/5]).](14/14_k08.jpg)
![Fig. #E2: Components of the telekinetic heater of Mr Davey (Fig. LA8 (3) from [1/5]).](14/14_k08_3.gif)
![Fig. #I1: Extraction Glow (Fig. H1 from [1/5]).](14/14_h01.jpg)
